Five Things You Hate about Teachers and What You Can Do About Them. . ..

Since so many people are leaving education in droves due to the Pandemic and resulting changes, I thought this old gem needed a revisit…

Steering with My Elbows

Editorial Cartoon: Hate | Teaching Tolerance5. We Have Summers Off.

(And Christmas, and Easter, and Thanksgiving. . . ) So many breaks, you’d expect EVERYone would try to become teachers. I can’t count how many times people work this issue into the conversation once they discover I am a career teacher. Currently, close to two-thirds of newly minted teachers quit the profession within three years of gaining a full-time teaching position, never to return. Maybe, as people like to blithely assert, they were women with a “Mrs. Degree” who were just waiting for Mister Right to marry them, so they could work at home raising their own kids and not yours. Maybe they landed a rewarding spot on American Idol. But whatever it is, summer breaks are just not long enough to keep that two-thirds in education for a career.

Just the other day, in fact, a man standing next to me in the…

View original post 3,570 more words

How to Refinish an Antique Door…

Here to share my journey (and massive learning curve) to refinish 17 vintage, two-panel doors…using a variety of strippers, elbow grease, etc…and give anyone who has experienced the same as an amateur or professional the chance to offer advice, tips, tricks, or just plain support…

First, we are “owner building” a house— of course it needs doors.  I thought, Gee, look at all these deals on social media platforms…$25 for a solid wood door?  I’m in!  We’ve been buying up blocs ever since…Our first set of 6 came in at only $100 for 6 vintage doors…pictured here, taken from a house.  built in the early 1900s.

Stripped, they look like some sort of curly pine.

Our second set came from a newer house, probably built in the 40s or 50s, and have a fine veneer on the rails, but overall have a mahogany tone. The next 6 were pricier at $40 bucks a piece, but well worth it.  Don’t know what I will find underneath.

Either way, they most likely have lead paint or even lead-tainted varnish. Yup, old timers added a version of lead to speed up drying times in varnishes and paint.  SO my first step, was learning about protecting myself from lead poisoning. 

PROTECTION:  I wear chemical gloves to my elbows and a 3M Respirator Mask rated higher than lead paint removal, and goggles, no matter what.  I do not let anyone come near my site without a mask.  Plus, I remove my shoes and clothes and hairscarf after I finish for the day and before entering the house.  I  work outside and shower when I am finished. Unfortunately, I will admit…my first door, I forgot a drop cloth.

STRIPPERS:

I’ve used Smart Strip, Smartstrip Pro, Citrustrip in a spray can, Citrustrip paste, KwikStrip…I even bought the practice box of Dumond products just to test.  What I won’t use are the strippers that can ruin the wood, like the PeelAway.  I plan to wax these gorgeous, wood doors into something beautiful and nostalgic, so I don’t want to ruin the wood.

SMARTSTRIP: I loved the idea of spreading on a product, laying on some paper, and yanking off paint like a gal waxing her legs!  And guess what, my first door?  It did just that. Man, was I excited.  Look here:

But then, Smartstrip did not work quite like that on every door.  Some doors had more layers, some had different types of paint and primers and varnishes.  In fact, my last four doors (coming from the “newer”  house,) the paint has refused to stick to the paper…no matter how thinly or thickly I left it, no matter how long or short I waited…SO the type of paints and how they are layered matters.

Some latex bubbles right up and sticks to the paper.  Other latex turns into a stringy mess, like hot chewing gum and will not adhere to the stripping paper.  And lead paint?  Yes, many layers will come off at once, but it will leave a muddy, chalky smear behind.  BUT this is still better than dry flakes flying all over the place, poisoning the air.

SMARTSTRIP PRO:  Yup, worked about as well as the regular product, but it did leave what looked like a few black water spots on one door, so I did not use it again.

CITRUSTRIP in a Spraycan versus Paste:  I found this product in both versions works faster than Smartstrip on LATEX, but not as well on tougher, older paints.  And though I have no idea why, the stuff in the spray can works the fastest of the three.  But spraying that much area is hell on my old thumbs.  I am going to try the liquid version…maybe it works as well as the canned stuff.

KWIPSTRIP:  yup, it worked faster than Smartstrip, but you have to neutralize it, and it can also make restaining impossible or blotchy. Plus, it turned the paint into a goopy, baby poop like texture that seemed impossible to scrape up; it just spread the color all over the place and deep into the grain.  After I tested it, I only use it when I absolutely have to.

TYPES OF PAINT

Though most of my doors came from three separate houses so far, the types of paints I’ve encountered have been a hodgepodge of tastes.  I’ve hit weird latexes, milk paint, oil lead-based, enamels, even old fashioned orange shellac.  And I swear there might have been wallpaper in there under some of the paint, too.  I’ve encountered mints, yellows, pinks, and a few shades of purples, and what looks like dark blue primer.  No door, and I mean NO DOOR has had the same exact range of colors and types of paint.   It sure would have been nice if each door had peeled off the way Smart Strip is supposed to work, like the first one did…but no…

This door here is the worst one yet: 

  That picture is  AFTER THREE PASSES. The first pass only raised a layer of latex.  The second pass I felt like I was scraping off linoleum; it was thick, and leathery and STUCK, but I got it off to find a whole new layer of what looked like blue primer…and under that was this lavender left over.  My fourth pass, I applied one last coat of Smartstrip and paper to sit over night…again, and finally reached varnish.  Hopefully, none of the other doors had whatever this devilish combination was…

TECHNIQUES, TIPS and ADViCE

  1. The longer a product stays on the better it works.  BUT do not let it dry outEven if you use the Dumond paper, you must keep it from drying out, or you are right back to square one.  I cover all that with giant plastic sheeting while it ferments. (Old shower curtains, etc.)
  2. Instead of Dumond Paper, I have also tried good old plastic wrap. You lay down your stripper, then cover it.  The paint won’t stick to it like it does to the paper, but since the paper only works about a third of the time, try plastic.  I bought the wide, industrial roll from my big box store.  Easier for plastic-wrapped challenged people like me.  (I can NEVER get it off the roll without twisting and sticking to itself…so I prefer the paper—but the paper is comparatively $$ and it dries out if you don’t protect it.  The plastic does not.
  3. A five-in-one to scrape has been the best of the tools I’ve tried.  So is my 2 edge scraping brush. Yes, everyone says use plastic scrapers, so you don’t damage the wood.  But I’m not Hulk.  I need a tougher tool, and it sure does the job once the paint is softened. And its pointy edge gets in the nooks.
  4. Once the paint is soft enough in the crevices, I use a cheapo toothbrush dipped in Denatured Alcohol to work it out.  Yes, a wire brush will also do the job, but it often damages the wood.  I keep a bunch from the dollar store; they can pick up the goop and be tossed, if necessary.  It will make a smeary mess, but then I use steel wool dipped in DA to gather it and then a wet microfiber rag to wipe that up.
  5. Barbecue skewers, carved popsicle sticks, and pointy Q-tips can also help in those crevices.  But again, the paint must be soft enough.
  6. Denatured Alcohol is your friend. (And so is high proof Grain Alcohol…cheaper, stronger, and tastier. Just kidding!) Never drink denature alcohol. It will kill you. Seriously.
  7. I’ve since figured out that hand sanitizer works even better than Denatured Alcohol, especially on this weird milk paint that would not budge for anything else…
  8. Once I get down to the last WET layer,  where the paint is mostly gone and only WET smeary residue (and perhaps varnish) is left, I work in small shifts.  I stress the word WET, because once any left over bit dries, this step is harder.  I keep the last wet layer wet, with Dumond paper or plastic wrap, and I work in 2 foot chunks.  I scrape off the last of the paint with my 5-in-1.  I dip my toothbrush in DA and work those last crevice bits into a muddy lather,  I use my steel wool  (even Chore Boy brillo) to scrub the flat surfaces, and then I scrape the mush into a pile and wipe it with paper towels and the damp rag to wash it off.  Repeat as necessary.  I’ve learned if I scrape that last layer off the whole door instead of doing a smaller scrape, scrub and wash, the smeary residue has dried and is harder to take off. 
  9. Once I’m down to that washed layer, it is usually ready for sanding and I wet sand first (because, as I said, old varnishes can have lead too that has leached into  the wood.)  If it still has too much color from the varnish, I do another round of denatured alcohol and hardy steel wool, wash with wet rags and then start my sanding.
  10. Sanding.  I use a flat sander that has a vacuum and Hepa attachment AND I keep a shop vac with a hep bag, running nearby as I sand.  The less lead dust I put into the air, the better.
  11. I wipe down with TSP wipes to “neutralize” lead dsut, then I wipe down with Mineral Spirits before final light sand.  TSP is controversial.  Do some research.
  12. All that goop I have scraped off goes directly into a heavy duty bag per our state lead regulations…

Anyway…I’m still trudging through, now on door 9, side number 17.  Each door is different, and not even the same wood inside one house.   It will take some creativity to get them a uniform color and look in the new house, but I’m excited to have something this pretty with this much history…And I am sure I will learn even more tricks along the way.  Good Luck on your own refinishing journey!

Some Cures Are Cruel: Letting ALZ Sufferers Go

Some Cures Are Cruel: Letting ALZ Sufferers Go

A few years ago, I wrote a long complaint about how our culture doesn’t know how to help you grieve when a loved one “dies” or rather, disappears into Alzheimer’s.  When your parent passes away suddenly from a heart attack, or even after a long terminal illness, people come out of the woodwork, but that random day when your mother no longer is your mother due to dementia or Alzheimer’s, there’s no one, no announcements, no ceremony, nothing.  She’s just gone. 

Sure, people occasionally ask me, “How’s your mother?”  But if I say, “Like a three year old…”  They squinch up their face in discomfort and say, “Oh, I’m so sorry.”  And that’s it…Or worse, they utter something ridiculous like, “At least you still have her…” and then go on to describe losing their mother to an aneurysm years ago…

I find myself feeding other people only the positives: “She can still talk…”

But lacking grief support is not the worst of it, honestly.  The worst is how we count milestones backwards from the same milestones one joyfully marks with their babies…”She can sit up, she can speak, she can walk…” These skills disappear in reverse in Alzheimer’s sufferers, until they are quite literally an infant lying helpless in a crib.  They return whence they came.  The best you can hope for is that a heart attack or stroke will claim them first.

Take my mother’s appearance, for instance.  She had always been stylish, taking excellent care of her wardrobe, neat, sharply ironed, attractively coordinated.  What I first noticed about her outfits, perhaps 5 or 6 years ago, she began color-coordinating like her life depended on it: royal blue shirt, royal blue pants, royal blue socks, blue shoes.  Somewhere in her brain existed a rule that she no longer could flex herself around. Then within two years after that, she had to be told that she could not wear the flannel nightdress to the grocery store, yet she could still don her own pants and button her shirts.  Now though she can still zip up her jackets, she cannot tell if clothing is on backwards or inside out, and she must be told it is time to get dressed or undressed; oddly, she still smears lipstick on before she goes about her day.  Neatly.  How odd.

We don’t worry about her appearance like she once did, but still…I predict by summer she will not be able to put her own arms into the sleeves or button her pants…

The words progressive disease is a misnomer.  I wouldn’t use the word progress in any form here.

Yesterday, I had an argument with my father about extending Mom’s life.  To put this into context, my father has always been clear that if technology arrived, he would freeze his brain until transplants were available.  For real.  He wants us to keep him on life support (should he ever need it) until Doctors find a cure for whatever is ailing him; he imagines one day being 167 years old.  

Mom never agreed with him.  However, as plenty of us do, Dad spends hours combing the internet, hoping for a cure for Alzheimer’s before Mom dies.

I explained to him how all the current studies hoped to stop Alzheimer’s in its track; the 70 year old who begins to show early signs can take the resulting drug and hope to get no worse.  No wide spread, serious research exists about restoring people as deteriorated as Mom is to their former selves.  Anything Dad gave my 82-year-old mother would only extend her life as the three-year-old she is now.  Even so, if medical science found a drug today that would stop the “progress” of ALZ in my mother, he would feed it to her religiously.  In fact, as her Power of Attorney, he says he will ignore her DNR contracts, and if he has to, he will go to court to reverse them.

This is just his grief talking.  But he trusts any fresh breakthroughs in ALZ meds will hold Mom in place until medicine does find a way to bring her back. 

As educated and as smart as my father is, he obviously does not understand what is happening to her brain.  He thinks that everything she has ever known is still stored somewhere in her mind.  However, Alzheimer’s is not just that plaques coat the synapses between neurons, damming communication.   It is that as those avenues are blocked, those neurons die.  Her brain is literally disappearing.  Any future meds that could rebuild her brain will not replace what knowledge is gone; imagine the physical therapy she’d have to go through to relearn all she has lost…at what age?

I am of the mind, however, that if I had my way, I’d take her off her heart medicine now.  Actually, if I had my way, I’d stop with any sort of her medicines other than pain killers.  I have begged my own children and husband to park me in the ocean long before I get as bad as Mom if I am unlucky enough to inherit this disease.  Expecting Mom to survive as she is now for any longer than she has to is cruel.  There is no way that I’d give her any medicine that would put her in a hellish holding pattern.

I had to take Dad to the dentist for oral surgery last week.  He needed someone to be there throughout the two-hour procedure.  But Mom had to come, too, for no one was available to “Momsit.”  The way her brain works now, she could not recall where we were for longer than a minute, and when I would tell her, she could not grasp why Dad needed to see a doctor, and fretted that he was hurt, and attempted to go in the back to find him.  And then she would embark repeatedly on the fantasy that she used to work in this office, sitting “there with those people,” (the receptionists behind the glass), and describing how these hassocks (pointing to what was really a coffee table) look pretty good now, because back when she worked here, they were covered in a really ugly fabric… but she didn’t understand why they made her stop working there, which would then agitate her. I repeatedly had to stop her as she jumped up to confront these unsuspecting women.

You have to wonder what Alzheimer’s victims experience in their mind’s eye, what awful nightmare is running through their brains.  Sometimes she thinks my house used to be hers and we took it from her.  Other times, she thinks she and I were in a bidding war and I won out and she was forced to buy something elsewhere.  Sometimes that makes her happy, because she is so glad that I got to live in such a cozy home. But other times, “losing it” hurts her feelings.  She loves my home, and forgets that her own is so much nicer…More likely, it is the emotion of being around my dogs and my children than prompts her feelings…

I can make a believable guess as to why she thinks she was forced to move out of her “own home”: being the wife of a military officer she had to leave many wonderful places behind before he retired.  Other times, I am at a loss.  Why would she think she was fired from an oral surgeon’s office, when she never held a job like that? She was a bank officer and a real estate broker before she retired 16 years ago, (which might explain the bidding war fantasy.) Plus, frankly, she was never fired from any job.

The worst “fantasy” recently was when she became very angry in a restaurant because, “That woman over there keeps looking at me.”  The woman in question was her own reflection in the wall mirror.  Every time she looked up, she saw herself, seeing herself.  She began twisting and turning to hide, surreptitiously checking back over her shoulder, and sure enough, there she was again, staring back at Mom.  At first, we thought she was kidding, because Mom smiled and told us how pretty that woman’s smile was.  Wink Wink.  But then she began to lose her temper. 

Like with babies, distracting is easier than arguing and explaining sometimes.  My sweet son, pushed his chair between my mother and the mirror and said, “Don’t worry, Gramma.  I won’t let that woman look at you anymore.” And then he ducked when she weaved.

How much harder will this become as the world makes less and less sense to Mom, and her brain creates horrors for her? You know how when you wake up and want to explain an inexplicable dream, you often add details to make it sensible—I think that is my mother’s whole mental landscape now. 

Why would anyone hope to make her live with that for any longer than she had to…? 

I try to prepare my father, who is obviously in denial, to realize he will need more and more help.  Right now, he takes her everywhere with him, almost like a pet.  But like the near melt down in the restaurant, she is not always compliant.  Typically, sweet-natured and willing, she understands explanations less and less.  For instance, in a grocery store line, I suddenly remembered something I wanted.  I could not send her to get it, nor leave her behind any more than I could leave an infant as I ran to collect the item.  In fact, a baby or toddler would have been easier, for I cannot scoop my mother into my arms as I rush back and forth.  Nor could I satisfactorily explain to her what I was doing or why we needed to hurry.

Like a child, she wants to know why…why…why.  But unlike a child, she cannot be answered or taught or cajoled easily.  Nor can you say, “That’s the fiftieth time you have asked that…” with any effect.  When he was a young boy, my oldest son liked telling the same joke again and again.  He learned that once is a great laugh, twice is a smile, and three times is booooooring.  Mom can’t grasp that…so basically,  I did not get the item I suddenly remembered in the store.  It was too difficult…

So…to those people who think, “Well, at least you still have her…”  you obviously have no idea.  I suspect these people imagine Alzheimer’s is simply not being able to remember.  Everyone has gone into a room and forgotten why they went in there in the first place: Oh, Yeah…my keys!  They think this is what the experience is like, multiplied in scope—a natural part of aging.  But we do not realize how much of functioning on a livable basis is rooted in our memory banks.  You cannot follow a TV show if you cannot remember what just happened.  You cannot carry on a conversation if you can’t recall what the first half of someone’s sentence was.  You cannot enjoy a park, if you suddenly don’t know where you are, why you are there or who brought you. Even planning the future requires a memory.  Your days might feel like you are constantly waking up from some coma…but every single second.

Yes, Mom and her family still have moments of love and connection…Yes, my father fears losing her body and soul…but at what cost?   Mom suffers the pain of confusion and nightmarish thinking, the isolation and indignity of being unable to do anything for herself, the weirdness of being in an unrecognized place surrounded by strangers (Who is that man watching her in whose-shower-is this?  Her husband, her home).  And the rest of us—helpless witnesses to her pain and confusion—suffer the loss of a loved one, while at the same time taking on more than any burdens that come with babies…

Yet there are no joys of a newborn in the house…when I start telling people that Mom “can still sit up,” it will be near the very end.

Please: Never cringe when someone tells you about their loved one with Alzheimer’s. Never say, “Yeah, but…”  Instead, ask them if they need a break…ask them if you can make dinner…ask them to tell you favorite stories about her…or even be willing to listen to how awful it can be…

Ironically like suicide scars, the symbol of hope…

The Big Crap the Digital World Dumps on Culture: Brides, Children, and NYC…

Sure, I too once mocked how older folks dismiss the modern world.  Even the ball point pen was predicted to be the devilish downfall of humanity when it hit the scene…It will come for each of us: this disconnect with new “stuff.”

However, my complaints are not exactly about technological changes.  Not quite.  I have issues with ways culture is shifting because of technology…

Consider:  The “First Look” trend at weddings, newly designed by professional wedding photographers so that they do not have to be all that talented at capturing reality.  They can stage everything, like so many other things in our world are now staged, to avoid missing the moment when the groom first sees his bride in her wedding get-up. “What?” You ask, “Are you talking about?” 

My best girlfriend when getting remarried received a schedule from her photographer with a butt load of times penciled around the clock.  Apparently my pal is preparing for a photoshoot, not a wedding: 10 a.m. Bridal Breakfast, 12:30 pm Bridal Dress-up (where photographer sets up pictures of bride putting her hair up, swiping her eyelids with make-up, sliding into her dress), 1:45 Bridal Party  (where the fully ready bride, her family and her maidens all pose around some predetermined location,) 2:30 Groom’s Party (same), 4:30 Full Wedding Party, 5:30 Reception Untouched (staged photos of all the food, china and flower details before anyone arrives);  7:30 Married Couple Post Wedding  etc., etc..

Notice there are NO 6:30 Weddingtaking-place pictures, no vows-spoken shots.  On this photographer’s website there is not one candid photo of any weddings…And she was not alone.  This is the trend among wedding photography. 

But it’s the 3:30 First Look that really proves my point: the photographer sets up the groom to capture his face as bride appears in the perfect lighting, dressed in her gown long before the wedding ceremony;  said photographer retakes the shot until she is happy with the look on the Groom’s face. In other words, the actual “first look” photo, might not even be a first look, and it is definitely going to be something the groom contrives after all that pressure to react to “the dress.”

So why did they  even have a wedding ceremony then?  In fact, when they went to cut the cake, no one at the reception was even aware because apparently the only thing that mattered was whether the photographer got a good angle.  Guests literally didn’t know they were scarfing down facefulls of frosting until the tradition was almost over.  I told my friend, if all you wanted are pretty pictures, you should have saved yourself the money and just got married at the courthouse and hired this woman for your staged couple’s pictures. 

Have we gotten to where keep sake photo albums of the wedding outweigh the vows?  I see this as a direct result of the selfie trend, which is a side effect of our digital world.  One begat the other.  We’ve become a world where photos supplant experience.

Which leads me to a related complaint.  What the hell is going on with all the weird matchy-matchy women groups? Is this the adult version of friendship bracelets of yore?  My tight group of five girls (read Clique) in the 7th grade spool-knit rainbow bracelets to wear so everyone could know we were it.  At least four times this summer,  I’ve seen grown-ass women doing the same with clothing.

The bridal parties of uni-dressers were the worst, nearly cruel.  One group of about seven women showed up at a rooftop bar where my husband and I sat, all of them wearing very tiny, spaghetti-strap rompers.  The bride sported white, of course, while the rest were in black.  And let me tell you, not every body type can carry off sleeveless, cinch-waisted short-shorts.  No one looked like they were having fun; and the larger girls quite obviously were trying to hide behind the others at every possibility, ducking and weaving and fanning their fingers over their bare flesh as their eyes darted about the room.  The next day on the beach, a different crowd of nine young women showed up in matching bathing suits. (Nine! I’ll complain about that ridiculous number another day)   The bride had a dramatic, white bikini and carried a floatation device shaped like an engagement ring.  Of course, she was surrounded by her “maids” who had been forced into black bikinis patterned like the bride’s.  At least the women who might have preferred a different, more demure style could hide under the waves…

Somehow in both cases, the look-at-us outfits seemed to squash any spontaneous, natural connection between them.  They clearly were there to be seen—Oh, and to capture “clever” selfies of the bride and her coordinated stooges—but not to socialize with each other.

What is this weird need to be the center of attention while simultaneously forcing others to do your bidding?  People must not grasp the point of Bridezilla where producers mean to denigrate that selfish behavior, not anoint it…

My complaint about the outfits and the “first-look” photography are linked in more than one way.  Both disregard the point of the wedding ceremony.  Neither respect the purpose of the day.  Two people are literally standing before their God and promising to try and love and honor one another for the rest of their lives.  How does modelling for photographs all day long or forcing women to humiliate themselves in public just to gain attention fit into that supposed love?  Both reduce a wedding to a Photo Op and into social media fodder…

The modern loss of true meaning in order to capture an image depresses me.  Do these sorts of brides even feel the spiritual depth of gathering your friends to bear witness to your love?  Or do they say yes to the proposal so they will have photos for social media like those fools who order food they won’t eat just to snap a picture of it.

But then, I also recently saw several matchy-matchy groups of female (dare I say middle-aged) tourists—not bridal parties—one dressed in slinky banana-colored tops at the US Open:

Another all in pink at the Met.  So this staging of grown women cannot just be a spoiled, mean-spirited bride issue.  Either way, parading in matching “supposedly” sexy outfits seems to be an attempt to gain attention, either from the television cameras nearby, or just plain old social media…

And then, let’s talk about socializing for a minute.  Or rather… not socializing, the disconnect caused by modern technology.

Erik Pickerskill has a series of photographs where people pose how we typically use our cellphones, only their hands are empty.  They sit on their sofas, pause on the sidewalks, stand on the subways staring into their clenched, phoneless hands.  This art depicts who we really are now, disengaged from the world, unable to ever be alone with our thoughts, as we stare into our tiny screens. 

I had this artist in mind when I rode the parking tram to the airport.  Everyone around me was staring at their hands…I mean phones.  Noone was daydreaming as they looked out the window, or chatted with the stranger next to them.  Walking through Central Park, people jogged by looking at their phones, standing in line at the museum visitors looked at their phones, waiting online in Grand Central Station and its gorgeous Art Deco Lobby, tourists looked at their phones…

I worry that this generation coming up will have vast chunks of their brain missing…chunks that develop only when you must occupy yourself with daydreams and imagination…

What happens to us when we do not devote any time through our days to being alone with our thoughts or connecting to the people and world around us?  Even babies in strollers stare at phone screens not the trees, or the skyline, or the people nearby…

The worst example of this screen obsession, however, isn’t about daydreaming, it’s about parenting.

We sat in a café yesterday between separate tables where parents dined with their individual child.  On one side, a father took a seat across from his five-year-old son as mother parked their car.  As they waited for her, they ordered Croque Monsieur.  They pondered the Egyptian mummy they were about to see at New York’s Museum of Natural History, the boy asking if he could touch it and wondering why he couldn’t wake the mummy up.  They then explored the parking situation in the city and why there were plastic shields between the café’s tables and on and on.   Each looking the other in the eye, very human, Dad offered his son thoughtful answers and questions.  They even engaged with us for a minute over the merits of grilled cheese.    

At the opposite side of our table, a Mom arrived with her young daughter.  The child was carrying a knotted balloon-sculpture while Mom was staring into her phone.  Through lunch, Mom never broke eye contact with her screen, no matter how hard the daughter tried to block her view with that balloon doggy.  She gently batted Mom’s forehead, boop boop; she asked questions; she tried to show her how the balloon doggy could walk on the table.  She swatted at the phone, but Mom was soldered to it, only stopping to snap a smiling selfie of mother and child having a “grand, happy” lunch. The only time the little girl got any sincere eye contact or one-on-one attention was when the sweet waitress knelt down and to ask her important questions about her day.  (I wonder how often wait staff feels compelled to do this for our neglected children…)

The difference between the tables was astonishing. I worry…what will become of our young if most of them have parents like the little girl’s?  …And no, it was clear the Mom was not on some important, cannot-be-avoided phone conversation.  She was just more interested in whatever was on that screen than in her daughter.

And to make matters worse, what we are witnessing instead of engaging is all staged, not even real…like the viral video of the poodle almost drowning in the family pool before his buddy the pitbull rescues him, where it is obvious the dogs’ owner has set this scenario up from the get-go; we are obsessed with screen life, even faked.  Yes, we have been watching TV for nearly a century now, with its fictionalized theater.  But now, we are stuck on a 24/7 sort of distorted reality that is not real, not spontaneous, not felt…Will any bride who sees her keepsake “first-look” photos ever be able to trust that the expression captured on her groom’s face is genuine?  Will those ladies dressed in yellow have any honest memories of their trip to the open?  But most of all, will that child in the restaurant know she is worth more than imagery..?

So maybe I sound like whoever was once scared of the ballpoint pen, and then the typewriter and then the photocopier.  But something horrendous is happening due to being able to socialize through “insta” pictures and video.  We have become obsessed with imagery of ourselves and each other, avoiding real connections.  We take pictures of things we do not experience—food, smiles, vows, friendship—we know exactly what our best side is and are not embarrassed to fake-pose to present it, we force our friends into humiliating outfits and our dogs into life threatening situations, we stage our most intimate expressions, and worse, we ignore our children…without thought to what we are losing in the long run. 

For what?

Try going a whole day without thinking about how [fill-in-the-blank] will look on a screen.  Try sitting quietly in a park without your phone.  Try experiencing something real without posting a picture of it or socially cataloging it in someway, at all.  Can you?

My Beef with Non-Binary-ism

I’ve never cared about how anyone identifies themselves…(well, except White Supremacists, Nazis, Neo-Nazis, Al-Quida, Inquisitors and the like, etc.  Their identifications scare the crap out of me.) Rewind: let me say, I’ve had problems with people’s hate-preferences, but never with anyone’s love-preferences. 

When I taught at a local university, one of my students wanted to write his major research project on legalizing the rights of homosexual men and women to adopt children; he knew he was required to present the paper to the class and was afraid of the consequences—“People might guess I’m gay. Then they’ll tell others…?” He had not begun to feel comfortable in his skin.  Lee was an older student, returning to college after a decade in the work force; he desperately wanted children in a time before the laws were enlightened, and begged me to be able to write his deeply personal essay, but not deliver it.

I told him, “Right now, hiding who you are cannot feel good.  You do not put this on and off like a suit.  You are YOU.  You are strong enough to deal with people’s negativity—You cannot imagine how free you will feel when you meet the universe as yourself…”

His classmates welcomed his speech, a fresh topic back then among all those clichéd abortion, gun control, and capital punishment papers that Comp II students still seem driven to write. The worst reaction was no more than a Yawn. 

I received thank-you notes for years from Lee for encouraging him to live his truth before the phrase “living your truth” was even in our lexicon, notes I’m proud of and save in my memory box. To give perspective, this took place years ago, in the decade right after AIDS had appeared and rattled bigots’ cages in the Bible belt.  Lee’s speech was his first step towards his own advocacy. And he went on to detail a much happier life in his letters to me, eventually becoming a father. 

Embracing who you really are is core to your happiness.

So don’t misunderstand when I say I have a beef with non-binarism.  Not the identity, nor the action  (I’m not one of those love-the-sinner-but-hate-the-sin sorts), nor even the politics bug me.  It’s the freaking PRONOUN I have an issue with…

My God…this “they, their, them” shit is an English teacher’s nightmare.  Getting writers to make their subjects and verbs agree in Georgia is hard enough.  The verb IS rules here.  “They’s just foolin’” or “Them’s the ones you want…”  And that’s when Southerners actually use helping verbs…Many folks don’t even bother with conjugating to be at all: “What Y’all doing?” or “Where you going?”  And the concept that NONE and EVERYTHING and ANYONE is a singular subject is just impossible. Nobody ever learns that rule, not even most English teachers, for learning language is by exposure to speakers, not textbooks.  And now you want me to try and explain how a single person should now get a plural pronoun if you know this person identifies as non-binary?  UGGH!  

Oh, sure on a philosophical level, maybe even a symbolic one, I can totally see how “they” can represent what a non-binary person is trying to express: the multi-faceted, non-singular perspective of their love or their gender fluidity.

HOWEVER,  Can we please come up with a word that doesn’t already have a very specific function in our grammar world?  I cannot tell you how often I’ve been reading a published essay or article lately and had to stop. “Wait, who shot the perp?”  “Huh?  Just a second…who got awarded the medal?”  I go back, feeling illiterate, like I had a brain fart and missed something.  All because the word “they” is used grammatically incorrectly.  Seriously.  And we expect people who won’t even recognize homosexuality as “normal”—let alone non-binarism—to have a clue what they are reading?  In a Zoom meeting, one of our group members had posted her name like Zoomers do—Maggie—but tagged on “she/her”.  The confusion among the others when she tried to explain why was laughable.  Of course, Maggie’s use might be an attempt to mock non-binarism or to support its importance, who knows for sure.  But either way, the others were not moved to grasp the issue, let alone change their pronouns.  It was like trying to teach them why split infinitives and dangling prepositions are wrong, times a zillion. 

The question might be for some: why can’t society create an all new pronoun?  The answer is often that a new word separates those people who identify as non-binary into a separate, lessor class, sort of like those idiots who insist on calling my pets “It” instead of recognizing them as the fabulous beings they are…However, I’d argue that applying “they, them, theirs” for single, non-binary people separates this group even more pointedly by the intended confusion this causes. Others might suggest that this confusion forces readers/listeners to perk up and ask, “Whuuuuh?” thereby introducing the non-binary platform.  Frankly, so would a new pronoun, but without butchering the grammar of sentences, and thereby disorienting readers and listeners. 

The answer lies in what we who care are trying to achieve with a pronoun shift.  Is it to identify as non-binary by classing oneself into a separate group, or is it to erase pigeonholes of gender? 

If the first, embrace a new pronoun representing only non-binary folks that does not confuse readers and listeners.  I doubt that anyone is ever going to get used to stopping in the middle of a paragraph to go back and figure out who “they” is referring to.  Look at this sentence from HuffPost about Demi Lovato: “I watched with interest as talk show host after talk show host documented their heroin-induced strokes and heart attack, along with their struggles with depression, substance use, self-harm, bullying and bulimia.”  Whose strokes and heart attack? Whose assorted serious illnesses?

A plural version of a new non-binary pronoun could make clear that the writer refers to Lovato’s health crises; a multitude of talk show hosts are not nearly dropping dead…

But if the change is to erase gender-identity pitfalls, coming up with a new gender-neutral pronoun for all human beings might be easier than repurposing one that is already entrenched to mean plural “people, places or things.”  True, we do occasionally use “they” singularly with indefinite antecedents, but we do so in a clear manner.  “Everyone should love their mother,” for instance, or “The caller asked you to call them back.”  However, though both those illustrations are not confusing, a grammar teacher would still strike you down for “antecedent/pronoun agreement errors.”

Either way, I do not look forward to trying to teach any of these new pronouns should they become widely accepted by the MLA, but a one-size-fits-all new singular word and its plural version would probably be easier to teach than the current non-binary use of “they, them and their.” Using “They, them, and their” would continually require self-conscious use, providing critics negative fodder in its unnaturalness. I’m just thankful I teach English and I’m not given the task of reshaping all the other languages in the world with their gender designated NOUNS, ARTICLES and ADJECTIVES and VERBS. 

Die Katze, die auf dem Tisch saß, miaute das Mädchen an.  Even a male cat Katze gets a female article „die“, the road Tisch is neutral, the verb meow Miaute is female because the word for the male cat is feminine, the girl Madchen, because she is a child, is neutered with „das“.

Oh, My WORD!

Demystifying ‘You Spot it, You Got it’

I had an interesting lesson in projection recently.  The old “You Spot it, You Got it!!” Disease.  Now let me say up front, I do not actually believe that every time you vehemently dislike how your mother-in-law is a Cold-Stone Liar, your own pants are actually the ones on fire.  I cringe when self-righteous people are quick to utter “You spot…you got it” whenever we talk about others. Such dangerous pop-psych. 

For instance, I took my mother-in-law shopping to furniture store she never knew existed before that day.  She found a painting she wanted to buy, priced at $239.  With a straight face, she told the salesclerk, “A few weeks ago I was in here and when you helped me, you told me that I could get this for $85.  I’d still like that price.”  The poor clerk blinked, blank because she was pretty darn sure she had never met my mother-in-law; had no memory of what she was talking about, but didn’t want to be offensive.  My mother-in-law’s dishonesty is famous, but still I was surprised…appalled and ashamed to be standing there next to her.  Her lies are common-place and manipulative, and I hate them.

But if I criticize her for this behavior, there are some people who have been trained to think (or say), “You spot it, You got it,” suggesting that I suffer deep-seated dishonesty and so therefore, everywhere I look, I see liars.  Hmmm…so every time you see someone else’s behavior as problematic, you are actually suffering the problem?  What you see in others is always self-delusion?  Does this sound right to you? 

Of course not.  That’s bullshit.  Uttering “You spot it, you got it,” has become a handy way to dismiss anyone from ever judging or criticizing others or maybe even a passive-aggressive way to insult others.  Ha-ha, I think you’re the one who’s ­­­_______(fill-in-the-blank).  When really, sometimes there are liars, or gossips or people-pleasers or meanies or condescenders, etc., etc., who irritate the shit out of you without their offense actually being your flaw, too.  So I have dismissed whenever someone gets on their high horse to automatically reply, “You spot it, you got it.”   It’s shallow.

But this past weekend was a real lesson in another way to look at that phrase .  I can no longer just casually assume I see everything clearly.  The psychological phenomenon of “Projection Identification” is real—a sneaky, slippery weasel that deserves a good rousting, really.

We do project, seeing other people through a lens clouded by our own “stuff.”  But what we see might not be the same hidden flaws buried within ourselves. Instead, the person’s offensive behavior might be tapping into a complex emotion.  For instance, perhaps we have insecurities about ourselves or conflicts we’ve yet to resolve with other people or things we’re trying to achieve that surface, unseen.  Like a person who lacks confidence, wishing they could be more bold, might call a confident person “Conceited”. This does not mean the accusers themselves are conceited, nor the accused. With me, being an honest person is something I admire and strive for. Perhaps, even to my detriment.  Dishonesty after all can be beneficial social and financial grist. 

I’ve watched colleagues lie about why they were late or had to take days off or why this work was not done on time. Ka-chinge!  I don’t do that, so I resent people who benefit and get away with their lie.  I get dinged for being honest about oversleeping, and they get forgiven for being late because, Gosh, a flat tire?  (My son says I need to just learn to lie, but I say, it’s weak and irresponsible…)   Thus, my mother-in-law’s flaw does tap into my own resentments…something I do need to work on, but it does not mean a literal, “You spot it, you got it.”

Recently, however,  I went through a perfect example of projection identification. I belong to a book club of  22 women who are all program, AA or Al-anon.  I wrote an email to them, broken into three points. (I’ve attached at bottom incase you want to see it.)  The first part mentioned two informational links they might enjoy reading.  The second part, my intent was to say, hey, we are all afficionados about something; you do not care about everything I care about, no biggy, but every interest has quality over accessibility and I tend to like quality in literature.  The third, was a simple complaint, where I said, it seems we have been pretty negative about all the books during the last six months, is it covid exhaustion? 

I sent this because for months now, no book seems to please them lately.  Obviously, any book…well anything… will provoke different opinions.  I never expect everyone to like or dislike anything to  exacting degrees.  But for whatever reason—quarantining, zooming, Winter’s end—it’s been months since the meeting didn’t spiral to a quick end after everyone agrees, “This book sucks.”  Well, not everyone.  Some people say nothing…And not only that, but the discussion is not real discourse over why the books “sucks.”  Just quick rejection.

They hated Grisham’s The Reckoning.  Well, I did too, but primarily because the answer to the plot’s mystery is revealed in the first few chapters.  Ultimately, they were ready to pack it in the first 10 minutes, dismissing the novel as too long and too unlikely.  The next month we read Fanny Flagg’s, Welcome to the World, Baby Girl. Knowing how book clubs question lists ask about the characters like we are gossiping about our families, I assumed my club would sink their teeth into Flagg’s famous and beautiful newscaster, her alcoholism, and even journalism’s tendency to worry more about celebrity gossip than real news anymore. The most relevant and meaty of the topic points, how the main character’s black mother had been “passing” as white and had no idea she was African American never even surfaced.  Boom!  Should have been a hearty and thoughtful discussion.  But no, they rejected the book before we said hello. Too long! Too choppy!

January offered the shortest book we have ever read in the history of the book club: William Maxwell’s They Came like Swallows, a bittersweet, poignant story following a family who loses its pregnant matriarch during the Spanish flu pandemic. The author tackled the difficulty of altering the narrator’s voice when he divided the point-of-view between the youngest son, his pubescent brother, and his grieving father.  I found it beautiful and subtle and very literary, and the group HATED it.  “Too wordy,” (Huh?  96 pages) “Unclear, hard to follow,” (Showed, didn’t tell.) “Nothing happened…I mean what’s it about!”  (Uh, the Mom dies during a pandemic.)

This is not the first time I have been the odd man out in the group, having been the only one who hated The Pecan Man a few years ago.  They were downright angry with me when I called it derivative and racist.  I’m used to a few rolling their eyes when I get academic.  One has even spat hostilely, after I  liked the symbolism in a different book, “I couldn’t care less about that.”  That’s all right. I know we are a book club with a lower case B and upper case snacks, as another describes us.   So I hesitated long and hard when they hated They Came like Swallows, listening quietly to all the insults. 

I finally spoke only after one woman called the grieving father a “Punk-ass Dad” because he wanted to desert his children.  Who cares that the scene where he briefly considers this takes place mere hours after the love of his life dies and he’s broken, nor that he dismisses that awful thought and keeps his children.  The scene is a subtle, gorgeous way to show how deeply the father is suffering.  But, No, he’s “punk-ass.”

Shocked that I—the only one— really liked the book, they asked me to explain Whyyyyy.  And loving the things they hated in the book, I used their insults as my jumping off point:  It’s a novella, not a novel short stories have a different purpose than novels, to examine a slice of life. . .the writer works hard to show and not just to tell, so it’s harder to follow.  It’s literary, not plot-driven; those usually are not attention grabbers.  Suddenly someone asked me, “What’s ‘plot driven’ mean?”  Startled, I went on to explain a little bit about commercial versus literary fiction, about accessibility versus quality.  A few seemed bored with my passion, but most seemed interested and grateful.  As I defended the book, the massive gap that the publishing world is forced to straddle between the plot-driven readers and the literary readers was obvious.  And many ladies were interested in more about that…

Before I slept that night, I found several articles that could respectfully answer their questions.   My intention was to find something that acknowledged that neither world is superior, just different.  And when I sent it to ALL, I also included a description of my discomfort that we as a group had slipped into a hole where we had not had many nice things to say lately about the books. 

Well, it was like I had set off fireworks, but no one saw the same colors.  Here are the various ways people projected themselves onto what I wrote:

­—One woman who is suffering from Parkinson’s was worried I saw her as illiterate, and she wanted to defend that she skims, and that is why she cannot recall details.   I had said nothing about her memory or anyone’s memory in my email. It’s obvious in the club meetings that I recall what I read, but I never remark on anyone’s memory. I also had not said anything that implied she should be a better reader.  In fact, I get more from her observations than anyone else’s most of the time, and I let her know this.  But her reaction was definitely a good example of projection identification:  she is worried about how her disease is affecting her ability to concentrate and defended that…

 —The next woman jumped to defend that she is not negative.  As in, how can I complain that everyone has been negative for months, when she has really enjoyed the majority the books?  She then went on to enumerate how many readings she liked.  This is someone who really works on her positivity in therapy and program—low, she shall not be judged as negative.  Of course, I had said it felt like WE had been grumbling a lot.  Plus, she had not been to many of the meetings , so she had no idea what I was talking about.  But her self-development made her quick to see herself in my words…

—-The next person responding, called to ask: “Are you okay?  You sounded really angry in your email. ..I just wanted to make sure you are okay.”  This is someone who admits that most of her life she fled from conflict and was not allowed to show her displeasure.  So what does she see in my words?  Conflict, confrontation, and anger.  I was not angry.   She also said, “My goodness…You said we do not care about you. Of course we care about you.”  My message said nothing like that (See for yourself.)  But man, she was ready to argue with me that I was wrong when I said, “I didn’t say you didn’t care about me; I said, ‘You couldn’t give a shit about the same things that I care about in books.’ ”  Not the same thing, No, She knew what she saw!  I let it go. 

—The next woman emailed, “I love you,” and thanked me for the links and said how respectful the links were and how respectful I was in my message because, “Yeah, we need to be less whiny.”  Her understanding came the closest to my original intent.  She did not seem to project anything onto my words other than she is a loving person??

—The woman who is  a long-time educator, saw my email as educational and asked if I could provide her with more to give to her teachers and called to discuss literacy in the county.

—The next person is what we might call the matriarch of the group…Though as 12-steppers who use group consciences in our club so that no one feels like anyone is the boss, this woman likes control; she often jumps into situations when we travel together with the where’s and the when’s, if you know what I mean, controls the vote, the menu list, etc..  She, as you can probably guess, saw my email as evidence that I was trying to wrest control of how things were decided in the book club.  She wanted to make sure I knew that all decisions were made a particular way, etc., and I shouldn’t expect to get my way.  She did not address anything I actually said, just wanted to keep the status quo as she saw it.  And of course, I made no mention of changing any systems.

—-Finally, there is my favorite example of Projection Identification:  After this next woman’s response, I said to my husband, guess who just called me arrogant, condescending, judgmental and patronizing?  He immediately guessed correctly, having long avoided this woman for being the most pompous and arrogant person he’d ever met.  How did he guess correctly?  YUP!  “She spotted it, and she’s GOT it!” in spades.    

The links I had sent were the result of people asking me directly to explain something.  I also looked long and hard for respectful links that focused on what they had asked in the meeting. Even my remarks during the book club were all responses to questions. So none of my email was just some pedantic BS I just suddenly decided they needed from “expert” me. This woman reacted by calling under the guise of “I have read and reread your email and I do not know what you want.  How can I make this a better experience..?”  Huh? 

 She then filled her phone call with any chance to insult me; for instance, when I said,  “I know that this is a social group, we are getting together to socialize, and people do not necessarily care about the same things I care about when they read a book, but we’ve just been ending the meetings before we begin…”   “Well,” she cut me off, “I find that comment very judgmental and patronizing…you have no idea what people care about.” Whaaat?  It only got worse.  She even tried to explain to me that she is used to thinking outside the box; she knows that her intellect intimidates people, so she has to often “phrase her words” so that she “gives people permission to think differently  from her” and she could show me how to do that…if THAT isn’t arrogant, I don’t know what is…

I’ve never witnessed such perfect examples of Projection, all tied neatly into one event. 

Even I was projecting, reacting to their negativity to books through the lens of a writer and literature teacher.  I took it personally when one called that poor father “a punk” and when they didn’t bother to even try to see the value in another person’s hard work, like all books are my children.  Writing a novel is no easy feat, and whether we like a book or not, there is always something of value to examine…so my own defensive emotions were projected onto each meeting.

I still say ‘You spot it you got it” is too often misused and offensively dismissive.  But obviously we cannot escape seeing the world through our own colored lens:  projecting our issues onto other people is obviously real and before we react, we could explore ourselves more closely…

Is Trump Reverend Jim Jones or Manson?

I think we have seen why education is failing America this week.  Logic and contextual thinking are abilities our schools do little to plant or harvest, too busy teaching kids how to bubble in scantrons.  Surely, the majority of the fools who stormed the Capitol do not understand our constitution.  Nor do they grasp the concepts of law or democracy.  But worst of all, they lacked the ability to navigate how Trump manipulates their emotions.  And they are clueless how he does not even do it for his own political gain.

No, worse:  he does it for the same reasons Reverend Jones convinced 909 people to commit suicide, Manson convinced seven people to murder strangers, and Lucifer in the Bible convinces anyone to sin:  to feed his own self-image, to get off on his own power. 

Yes, Donald J. Trump is a narcissist of a psychotic type; Sure, that means he adores being adored.  But more than anything, he enjoys feeling God-like.  And what defines a God, but the power to create and control. I doubt Trump even wants the responsibility of the presidency.  Has he done anything since Biden was named the President-elect that has anything to do with governing our nation? No, he does not want to lose, which is very different from wanting to win,

Mostly, he just likes watching his base dance to his whims—the hallmark of a tyrant. 

I’ve often wondered when his base will feel insulted that he thinks so little of their intelligence that he assumes they will never guess what he is about.  But first, they must wake up. His whole life is an example that he does not value what they value, does not believe what they believe, but still. . .they believe and value him.  Obviously, he was right about their susceptibility to his persuasion.  Even Stalin and Hitler had political agendas behind their fisted propaganda, evil as .  But Trump?  Nope.

His interest is entirely to see what he can force his base into doing for him, and they do it ecstatically, like ascetics whipping their own flesh.  Maybe they deserve to be mind-fucked.

This whole “both sides have good people” opinion that was twisted a few years back is resurfacing on Facebook this week, as citizens try to rectify this gash between those who are blind to Trump’s megalomania and those who fear it.  Americans who cling to that two-sides nonsense have been manipulated into believing that having very different perspectives on important issues like human rights and equity and a free democracy is *just fine.*  Was it fine for people to have very different ideas about slavery?  Or the subjugation and infantilization of women?  Was it fine for people to have very different ideas about Hitler? Or the Inquisition?  Or crucifying Jesus? Please.  As I said, the participants in DC’s mass hysteria and those who dismiss their behavior with a simple utterance of “both sides are good people” do not understand their history.  They fail to accept that sometimes there is evil on “one side.”  Trump telling his base what they were doing was “patriotic” and he “loves” them is half of that evil, and believing him is the other half.

Trump’s selfish pandering to the violent racists in his base should be obvious to everyone a mile away, but emotions obviously have over-powered his base’s ability to see reason, if they ever can see reason.   The woman—a Q-anoner— who died with a bullet in her neck was convinced she was purging the office of baby eaters.  Did Trump ever ask his people to get real about the black-magic, Salem-days thinking of Q-anon?  No, he—a man who knows no democratic leader is eating any babies— manipulated his puppets by defending Q-anoners, because puppet mastering is his pleasure.  You can easily imagine him gleefully giggling when he watches his machinations unleashed.  Again, I assert these people lack a foundation of logic or an understanding of history.

The people who broke through the windows of the Capitol of the United States of America have been compared to the people who broke through the windows of the local Tommy Hilfiger and Vans Shoe Stores this past year during protests over the unlawful deaths of numerous African Americans.  This dispersion is an attempt by Trump’s base to minimize the horrors of what their extremists have done.  Are these supporters completely deluded?  Storming a sacred government building, the symbol of our freedoms, while congress is carrying out a democratic election with the intentions of imprisoning congressmen and overturning election results, because one trusts, and worse, worships a lying, defeated man is a far greater crime than vandalism and theft. To judge both through the same prism is a ludicrous manipulation. 

One group is attempting to gain the freedoms afforded by our constitution, to uphold the constitution, to force fellow citizens into recognizing that people of all races are Americans and deserve the essential rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that our constitution encourages.  The other is subverting the constitution in the name of dismissing over 82 million American voters and our legal government systems.  Stealing handfuls of clothes from Nike, while also illegal, is not the same as breaching our government stalwart and threatening the lives of our government leaders during what is supposed to be constitutional transfer of power.  At all.  Any attempt to compare their anger and intentions is again, a mind fuck, a dismissal of reality.

And yes, these foolish anarchists in D.C. believe they are defending America from a “rigged election” though they have only seen evidence that the election was not rigged.  Anything they point to as “proof” has been discounted as false or nonexistent. Republican Bill Barr says so.  Republican Brian Kemp says so.  Republican Raffensberger says so, as did his investigative staff of Republicans.  Over 60 different lawsuits, headed by judges, who may have even voted for Trump, say so.  Even the Supreme Court with one-third of its judges seated by Trump dismissed any cases for lack of evidence.  Yet, without any concrete evidence, these protesters still somehow paint themselves as disenfranchised and unheard and as robbed as any minority group in the United States because Trump repeats over and over, like some sort of Goebels, the lie that he did not lose.  But of course, the majority of the people who attended this “protest” with the orchestrated intentions to disrupt the United States’ election process do not have a clue who Goebel’s was, nor could they define the word propaganda, let alone recognize when they are its victim.  

Because of this, some of those “good People” who did not go to the insurrection (but might have wished they could have) want to argue that the rioters’ rage is evidence of how derailed American trust has become, and ask that the rest of us should consider the rioters’ opinions rather than judge their actions.  Ridiculously Ironic when their mistrust comes from trusting a liar and his daily hynopedic, Huxlian brainwashing chants.

You’d think if there were real evidence of election fraud, these believers would understand that this evidence would be everywhere, or at the very least filmed by Trump and shown by Trump in his many, many tweets and videos; Trump himself would not keep it under wraps for some dramatic reveal days before the inauguration.  But that is the foggy foundation of a conspiracy theory—“the liberal power” is so powerful, they can keep it all underground and unseen by only the opposition.  Nixon couldn’t keep his corruption a secret, Kennedy could not keep Marilyn Monroe a secret,  Harvey Weinstein could not keep his abuse a secret, but somehow, half the country, along with a sprinkling of Republican “enablers” secured some “secret pact” to overturn the election shrouded in secrecy, unavailable to the naked eyes of Trump lovers only. Tell me that doesn’t prove these folks are some uneducated dumbasses.

Trump is obviously relying on either his base’s dishonesty or their mental density to promote what is so clearly subterfuge.  The man knew he could say, all the way back in August “Only way we lose is if the election is rigged,” that would be enough for them.

He knew that they would believe comparing them to American forefathers who broke from a tyrannical British monarchy would lead them blindly into doing his bidding.  He (as did Hawley and Cruz) trusted that he could exploit their emotions and ignorance to gain votes.  He knew that their understanding of history was shallow enough that they could not see that the U.S. Constitution is the leader of our country, not a single man.  And that by threatening to upend that constitution was not an act of bravery but an act of treason. 

And attempting to say that half the country feels this way in order to erase the treasonous behavior is just one more manipulation.  Did you see the number of people crossing the Mall the morning of January 8?  They were only a fraction of a fraction of the 250, 000 people who attended Martin Luther King’s speech, nor the 500, 000 in 1989 and 470, 000 in 2017 (with millions more nationwide) marching for women’s rights, nor the 857,000 men who came in 1995 to support ending the stereotypes of African-American men.  The attendees of all those civil rights marches filled all the corners of the Mall from Lincoln Memorial to the Capitol building and all roads in between.  But last week, the actual number of people running up the Capitol stairs looked to no larger than one high school bleacher full of drunk and rowdy rednecks.

It’s as if the insurrectionists and even those people who feel compelled to defend them or excuse them do not understand how votes are counted, how ballot machines work, how investigations are run, how courts function, how checks and balances work, why accepting defeat is part of democracy, what treason really is, or even what evidence actually is.  Belief is not evidence.  A feeling is not evidence.  Integrity is not standing up for what you believe in regardless of its validity.  Integrity is accepting defeat in the face of all evidence that you lost.

The interesting thing is that of all the people I know who are still trying to defend Trump and last week’s atrocity, those same people who mix up the majority of liberals with the extremist liberals, are the folks I know never went to college.  And of course, they act like this lack of education somehow makes them more pure of thought, believe that colleges brainwash people into becoming liberals.  My education planted and nurtured enough logic that I am not easily led by a megalomaniacal sociopath when he tells me the virus is a scam, global warming is a lie, and that I can storm the Capitol Building and overturn an election and still be a patriot.  But more than that, I am also very aware of how in history, leaders have used people’s fears and their egos to manipulate them into supporting their wildest dreams.

Obviously, America needs to bring back a more formal form of education where people understand their constitution, their government, their rights, and of course, how to count.  But not only that but understand the responsibility of defending and protecting that constitution.  People breeched and threatened our governing officers of the Constitution, and the fact that ANYONE in America is not enraged by this demonstrates a lack of allegiance to our constitution and our country and a lack of understanding of what a high and dangerous crime this is.

My Body (and Liver) Love Quitting Sugar

I am late to the “I Quit Sugar” heap, I know.  So many blogs out there, why pile on?  Because it is that important.

I *might* have NAFLD. . .Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.  I was a fit woman once upon a time.   Before my spinal cord injury 7 years ago and resulting long-fusion and accompanying hardware, I played tennis umpteen times a week.  I also had a job on my feet all day. I definitely surpassed the 10K steps trend.  My cholesterol was excellent, my blood pressure model-perfect.  My weight was, well, heavier than you would have thought by looking at me, but I have always been a muscular girl.  In other words, I was fit by all standards. . .

Even so. . .I had a belly.  Not a flabby, robust stomach, but a hard, almost swollen stomach, that area just under my rib cage.  Oh, it’s a family thing.  Oh, I’m apple-shaped. . .  Then came the spinal cord injury and it only worsened.  Without the constant physical activity (I cannot run or play tennis anymore,etc..) I became too sedentary and for the first time in my life, I was fat. I went from a tiny crab apple shape to a pumpkin.

Because of my spine, I get scans periodically: MRIs, CTs, even a mylogram.  A radiologist is the specialist who interprets all the images, regardless of symptoms, and will remark on everything whether anyone wants to know or not.  Meanwhile, the doctors—PC, Urologist, or Neurosurgeon—who ordered the scan, often summarize only the results of what they want to know—your lungs, your bladder, or your spine—for the patient.  Most people never see what the radiologists’ notes are on these scans and just trust their doctor to inform them. Oh, I did that, too, while my neurosurgeon described this vertebra or that disc when we gazed at the images together.

But then I got all my records printed out for an insurance purpose and happen to read some of the radiology reports.  I discovered my neurosurgeon had only paid attention to the results on my spine.  One particular scan, however, also noted a small tumor on my thyroid, a cyst on my ovaries, an unknown kidney stone, and fat on my liver. 

Well, no one told me.  None seemed to be bothering me, but still, I had to be the one to ask my PC about all these things.  The thyroid scared the endocrinologist, a very rare, but benign growth, which needs attention periodically, the kidney stone was too big to pass and the urologist wanted to keep an eye on its position, the cyst on the ovary resolved.

And my liver? The numbers were mostly fine, a bit high, so Primary Care Physician was not that worried. Not all the different radiologists on all the different scans over the years have remarked about “Fat on Liver” so I asked: “Is it a mistake?” 

My PC at the time said, “Yeah, based on that and the shape of your belly, you probably have fatty liver disease. Lose some weight.”  Uh. . .is that all?  I tried counting calories like mad for six weeks, religiously using an app that helped with diets and exercise (water aerobics).  Not an ounce dropped off.  I told myself and everyone else, I cannot control my weight with food, I have to be able to really run, really get my heart rate up, but. . .how?

Then I had a weird thing happen in 2018.  I had a series of bladder infections and one of them sent me to the hospital.  The doctor was afraid I was suffering from C-Diff, a deadly infection people get after too many antibiotics.  No, but I was suffering from severe liver inflammation.  My numbers were ridiculously high; before they solved the problem, I became jaundiced and my side was in great pain.  They decided my gall bladder was the nasty little bugger causing the problems—though it had no sludge, no stones, which are usually the indications that the gall bladder has to go.  Soon after they removed it, my liver started behaving again.  Again, I asked about the “possible fat on my liver.”  This surgeon glanced through the most recent scans and said, “Oh, your gall bladder was the problem, but maybe. . .you should talk to your PC.”  Again, my PC said, “Yeah, based on all that you should try to lose weight.” 

I got a different PC. This one sent me to a gastro who specializes in Hepatic function.  A million tests later, he did not confirm nor deny NAFLD; all he could say was, “Yes, your liver numbers are high—but not too far above normal, stop eating beef and pork and fats.”  Okay.  I did.

Then this year, that kidney stone that has been lurking decided to go on the move.  And out it had to come.  Laser surgery broke that sucker into a million tiny pieces, which doc hoovered out.  But I had a poor result, and after fighting an infection with antibiotics, I had a very similar reaction to the one I had to the bladder infection/gall bladder incident of 2018.  I was hospitalized again, and once again, my liver was going bananas.  (I suspect my long-gone gall bladder was NOT the culprit in 2018;  Perhaps, in both cases, the antibiotic and my liver were not compatible.  And a bit of research shows that this brand/type has caused hepatic failures.)

I spent several days in hospital on IVs, and slowly my liver began to behave again.  THIS time I met a doctor who listened to me when I said I thought it was the antibiotics and my liver.  He asked me if I had ever been diagnosed with NAFLD.  I said, not exactly, and told him about the scans and the confusing responses I got from doctors. And then he actually gave me real advice

He said, “Yes, once I saw a scan of my own and noticed that the radiologist saw fat on my liver—my doctor did not mention it.  I saw it myself, just like you.  That is the hallmark of NAFLD.”

I told him, I try very hard to protect my liver.  I drink alcohol hardly ever,  I do not eat red meats, I rarely eat cheese.  I cut the fats. . .I eat all the stuff that is supposed to be great for the liver like beets and grapefruit!  And I explained how hard it seemed for me to lose weight.

He said, “I understand.  But let me tell you this:  do not worry about the number on the scale.  Yes, I needed to lose weight when I saw my liver’s fat on my own scan. But what you should do is stop eating sugar.”

I argued how I am not a big sugar junky. I do not binge on cookies and I almost never eat candy.  And he cut me off, saying, “What about your coffee in the morning?  Even fructose and fruit?  Your liver converts sugar and fructose directly into fat and stores that fat right in the liver.  You must stop the sugar.”

Well, why didn’t somebody tell me!!  I was guilty of all those.

I learned then that the Western diet is so full of sugar that Cirrhosis caused by alcohol will be surpassed in my lifetime by sugar-related cirrhosis. Doctors no longer call a fat, round stomach a beer belly, but a sugar belly. 30% of all liver transplants in the U.S. today are caused by NAFLD that became NASH (non-alcoholic steotohepatitis).

This was the hospitalist (or what some places call “The Attending”) who educated me.  He was simply the guy overseeing what all the specialists were doing while I was in the hospital.  The Gastro checking my liver said nothing of the sort.  My new PC never mentioned sugar.  And of course, the last time I was in the hospital with my liver in danger, I was served every sugary food they could think of: juices, jellos, puddings (Soft stuff they thought I could stomach.) Even the old PC who suggested I have NAFLD, the one who twice told me I should lose weight, never said, Stop Sugar.

Well,  I stopped sugar.

And here is the result.  First and foremost, I feel great.  I do not have these odd drops in energy, you know the kind, where putting your head on your pillow in the middle of the afternoon is all you desire. . .I don’t mean to make it sound like I’m ready to bound up a tree like a hyper squirrel or anything, but it’s more that grogginess is not my constant companion.  This “more energy” thing you read about on ubiquitous no-sugar sites is less a spike or a blast pushing me, and more a stabilized, comforting alertness.  Overtime, I’ve noticed my hunger is not as biting in the morning; I used to joke “I’m so starving, my stomach is starting to eat itself” if a meal was late; Never feel that way anymore.  Sure, I get hungry, but not gnawing hunger.

And to be honest, I did not notice these differences right away. I think the changes occurred right away, but because they were an absence and not an appearance, I did not miss them. . .The one time I have felt “starvation” was a surprise to me, like, Oh, yeah, I forgot about you!   On Thanksgiving I promised myself pie—afterall, I’m not a diabetic, I’m not going my whole life without the pleasure of a great treat, and won’t the pecans offer that all-forgiving protein and fiber?—but an hour after my small slice, I wanted to crawl in my bed.  No, it was not tryptophan; we did not eat turkey—I was feeling a debilitating blood sugar spike and drop that I once thought was normal.  And I recognized, again, Gee, that’s how I used to feel! 

Second, the weight I could not drop by counting calories is falling off of me, and disappearing most rapidly off my stomach.  I know not everyone has this result, and some people even gain weight when they give up sugar because they start eating more fats than they are used to, but I’ve lost 23 pounds since the end of September.  I do not count calories.  While I still avoid beef and pork, I do not worry about measuring proteins and carbs or anything that is trendy. . . I just do my best to eat balanced meals that meet that nutrition triangle we have had rammed down our throats since kindergarten.  Last night, I had mushroom ravioli and a cream sauce (made from Ripple, not actual cream. . .could not tell the difference.)  Earlier this week, I made meatloaf with ground chicken and bison, and sides of sauteed carrots, mashed cauliflower with an added potato.  The boys also had bread.  And even bread, I will eat, as long as it is not a type that is full of sugar.

I am not necessarily avoiding naturally occurring sugars in some foods like cheese or green beans, or even carbs like flour or rice (though I limit these last two), but I am definitely avoiding ADDED sugars if I can, which is where things get dicey.

Finding packaged, convenience foods that do not have added sugar is nearly impossible.  And let me tell you. . . the food industry is not legally obligated to be completely honest about sugars, so you MUST learn the various names for sugar if you want to avoid it.  I bought some fat-free Half-and-half for my coffee (Why, yes, haha, it IS an oxymoron). I’d looked at the large nutrition panel and not the tiny ingredient list when I bought it (because I did not have my readers with me, that’s why).   The nutrition panel said, “0 added sugars”.  I consumed it for a few days before noticing that corn syrup was the second ingredient.  Well, apparently, unless it is actual cane sugar, the producer can state it has “no added” sugars. 

I’ve had to make sure I read into the fine print.  There are over fifty different ways sugar can show up in that list and my liver cannot tell the difference.

Take a stroll through the market and randomly pickup cans and boxes; read the labels.  You will see, not only have the majority of companies put sugar in their products for no good reason—potato chips, corn, chili, pasta—but you will also see how they lie to you, stating there is zero or <1 gram of added sugar when there is quite a lot more.  In fact, knowing how mothers want to feel they are feeding their children something healthy, many cereal boxes will scream “no added sugar” on their front panel, only to list malt extract or maltose in their ingredients.

 With that said, I also do avoid some foods that have higher amounts of natural sugars than others, like cow’s milk and fruits.  As the doctor said, “You must stop eating fruits.”  Whaaaaat?  Aren’t fruits a whole category on my healthy pyramid?  And mangos and pineapple were my favorite sweets, making me feel superior to my husband who can down a box a GoodNPlenty every night.  But as the doc said, the liver converts fructose right into fat and stores it in its walls.  Further reading suggests that the fiber, antioxidants, and nutritional benefits of fruit outweigh its sins of fructose.  So, I do eat fruit; I just choose the ones with fewer grams of fructose, like berries and grapefruit, over mangos and dates.  And I don’t eat multiple servings per day.   At first, I tried to go fruit-free.  But I noticed that by the third week, I was dragging.  I think I was not getting enough nutrition. .. since cutting out packaged foods AND fruit eliminated a portion of my typical diet.

I also do not use any sweetener other than Stevia.  Period. 

If I am trying to protect my liver, too much research argues that all the other sweeteners spike my blood sugar and can result in the same problems.  Most—not all—show that Stevia does not. 

And let me tell you, I have always hated, passionately spit-it-out hate, fake sweeteners.  And I used to sugar up my coffee like it was competing with Baskin Robbins’ coffee ice cream.  At first, I disliked even the stevia. But after going without sugar, and researching stevia brands for quality, I am now excited to have my coffee in the a.m. again.  Some argue that this will keep my sugar cravings in cycle, causing me to stumble in my quest.  Maybe that is true with the other sweeteners that do spike blood sugar? But so far, that has not been the case with Stevia.

And. . .Yes!  I’ve noticed that savory tongue-thing happening—foods that did not used to taste sweet are so obviously sugary now.  I make a Ukrainian pasta called PediHeh (or Verenky or even perogies to others) for my father around this time of year.  It was always savory to me.  Now it tastes like dessert.  It is a mixture of eggs, flour, butter and cottage or ricotta cheese.  And I swear it seems like I have added scoops of sugar to it.  I made sweet potato puffs for dinner, and I felt like I was eating a donut.  I had read how this distortion would happen, yet it still astonishes me.

I must admit, though, the one thing that every other sugar-shunner bragged about was eluding me.  I read how people will eventually find sweet things, not only too sweet, but distasteful. Not me. I still had daily cravings, picturing very specific sweets.  There is a little bakery in town that serves raspberry cronuts and I found myself thinking about them wa-a-ay too much in the last few months.  There is a certain crispness to baked goods that celery cannot copy.  Thus, nutritionists say that giving into these sorts of cravings now and then cannot hurt.  So last Friday, I let myself have that treat, and less than half way through I had to stop.  It was not satisfying me. A mouthful of melted lollipop could not have been more gross; the texture felt more gunky and plastic than crispy and delicious.  I tasted my husband’s brownie and my son’s cookie.  Same problem.  Wow!

Yesterday, I looked over the display at a Panera bread, filled with croissants and cookies, cakes and muffins. Tempted in the past, I might have bought a sampling, but yesterday?  Nothing spoke to me. At all.  Holy crap, the shift had arrived!

Is my liver doing better?  I do not know.  I have my yearly physical in January.  My last hospital stay, my numbers had improved, but were not yet normal when I was discharged.  We’ll have to see.  But you know. . .since, so far, no doctor has ever completely confirmed nor denied the existence of NAFLD, I can only go by My Own Gut, and it tells me I’m onto something good here.

Dead but Alive: Etiquette?

Ocean Sunset | Nature photography, Ocean sunset, Beautiful sunrise

My Mother died sometime early last year.  But no one sent our family any condolences.  No one shared a series of memorable moments or spoke at her funeral.  In fact,  I cannot even tell you when she actually left us.  My mother has Alzheimer’s.  And if you think saying she died though she still lives is being melodramatic, then you have never loved anyone who  succumbed to this horrible disease.  Her body is eighty.  Her mind is both childish and elderly; no age fits.

She was diagnosed five years ago through a spinal tap that showed she had particular proteins. Though not fool proof, these can be defining marker of ALZ.  However, I first noticed that something was up on a trip to the Gulf in the Summer of 2013.  

We both burn in the sun, her much faster than I, and we have both suffered small skin cancer surgeries, yet we refuse to stay away from the beach. We love the water so much that we prop ourselves under a fancy umbrella, coat ourselves with thick layers of zinc oxide like cream cheese on bagels, and stay put until nature drives us indoors. 

We planned to splurge on early dinners each evening. Though she had been to this beach a number of times, I noticed that she could never recall where our car was after each meal.  Gee, that happens to all of us sometimes, right? But this was every time we parked.  Nor could she understand why I turned left out of the condo lot when we drove to dinner.  Left was the only direction we could go and not hit the sea.  Worse. . .she often struggled to pull up certain words. “The. . .the. . .whatchya call the thing that. . .the the. . .” These were subtle clues that perhaps only her daughter would notice. 

My grandmother also had Alzheimer’s, a specific type of Dementia, so we knew word loss is a symptom. Gramma’s disease didn’t seem obvious until she was deep into her 80s.  Therefore, my mother’s apparent memory failure at 73 frightened me.  And her. So early. Too early. 

She was never one to lose control, yell in anger, but when, on our trip home, I tried to discuss how she was struggling with direction, she screamed that if I ever asked her about her memory again she’d cut me out of my parents’ will.  As if they have millions to pass down (They don’t), as if this would stop me from figuring out what was up (It didn’t).  She was in tears, and we didn’t speak the rest of the afternoon’s drive.  But I knew, and her aggressive fear supported my suspicions. 

Each small step off the Alzheimer’s cliff was harder to ignore and even harder to discuss.   

By Christmas, she gave me odd gifts, very unlike her to purchase, as if she did not know me.  This was my first sense of loss.  My mother was typically so astute and thoughtful about presents.  When I said so to a group, expecting comfort, one woman scoffed and told me I was being silly and jumping to conclusions, judging me as if perhaps, I were selfishly complaining about “weak” gifts, and not frightened for mother’s brain.  I couldn’t care less about the product. The act was was the issue.

By the next Spring of 2014, Mom would call me, worried about my health insurance.  I’d reassure her that I had great coverage.  And then a few days later my phone would ring: the same concern.  And reminding her that we repeated this conversation a few days earlier rarely ended well.

But. . .she was still Mom, still happily playing bridge, cooking, socializing, reading books and discussing the world with me.

My father made appointments the next Spring of 2015, when it was clear to him that she, the woman who introduced us to and then taught us how to use the personal computer and all its accessories years ago, fell victim to an email-slash-phone company scam.  After adjusting all their accounts to save them from fraud, Dad knew his wife of nearly 60 years was not completely herself.  Sometimes when you are that close to someone, recognizing the change is harder.   But still. . .Mom was Mom. 

I almost joined a support group in Atlanta eighteen months ago, but the leader of the center told me attending would simply scare me since my mother was still “with us” in terms of being independent and cognitively capable.  Sure, she couldn’t always think of the word for washing machine, but she’d laugh when I filled in the blank, and thank me, joking, “See, it’s just words I can’t find.  If you were always with me, I’d never have trouble. . .” 

I had watched my grandmother die with the disease at 92, so I understood what this group advocate meant.  However, my grandmother, though she lost her ability to speak or walk, never became violent or nasty, never roamed the halls. . .never became. . .a lump. There was a spark in her to the very end; possibly a heart attack took her and not the final stages of Alzheimer’s where the victim becomes totally disengaged and incapable of anything at all, even breathing.

The advocate I had contacted suggested I was not ready to listen to the horror stories that others might need to share in a group setting, for right then, my mother was still herself; she would call me,  still knew all her grandchildren’s names and mostly their ages, and what was up with each.  She still discussed my two cats and two dogs like her own family, wishing she could take them home, make them her pets.

Yet, we were all reeling, knowing what was descending on my mother and our lives. Bit by bit she was losing herself. And there was zero help for these early stages.

My father took Mom to visit her brother and his wife in Virginia the summer of ‘17.  Mom knew who they were,  but did not know their children anymore. My Aunt thought Mom acted much better than I had described. My Uncle was shocked at how badly his sister had failed.  She was at the point of repeating herself, retelling the same story in mere minutes, and this threw him for a loop. But worst of all, Mom was very aware that this awful disease was stealing her away, and she felt shamed that they could see it.  

I traveled with her to her brother’s home again Spring 2019, and though both remarked that Mom seemed more relaxed and not much “worse,” she would cry herself to sleep next to me, in the guestroom bed we shared, moaning how I was the baby and she was the Mom, not the other way around.

“This isn’t right,” she complained.  

The fact that I had to navigate ticketing and security and boarding for her as we traveled through Hartsfield to Newport News, and worse, had to poke through her suitcase—did she have enough undies?  Socks? Was she packed properly for cooler weather?—didn’t feel right to Mom.  I told her this was the circle of life while I rubbed her back, helping her fall asleep.

“Mom,” I said, softly in the dark,  “Sometimes a Daughter gets to care for her Mom.”  Though I knew her emotions were part of the disease and not necessarily part of her logic, I still tried to reason with her, calm her with these words.

My mother had always been the most capable, talented, clever woman I’ve ever known.  If there was something she wanted to figure out, she did.  If there was a skill she wanted to learn, she became an expert:  Sew, reupholster, keep the accounts, invest, revamp the computer, strip furniture, knit, crochet, paint, bake, garden, bridge. . .parent. . .all while also making a serious living as a real estate broker before she retired.  Her husband in the Air Force when we were growing up, she often reared us alone, kept a beautiful home and then packed up and traveled the world whenever Dad was reassigned.  She was smart and witty, and insightful.  And though I am her grown daughter, and have inherited many of these traits—she made me self-confident—I still leaned on her for her wisdom and companionship; I still desperately want to. 

And to realize that slowly, but surely, she could no longer do these things was killing her emotionally.  At first, after diagnosis, she could remember being once able to do just about anything,  but knew she could not recall how to apply those talents now;  this fact depressed her.  Up till a few years ago, she often pulled out a letter I had written to her on her 50th wedding anniversary,  telling her how admiring I was of all of her traits. . .traits I then listed in detail for her. I described how she was the greatest role model anyone could have.

“I love this letter. Did you mean all this?” she’d ask.  Then later, as her memory worsened and these skills faded like a dream, she would read and wonder, “How did I do all these things?”

I’m glad I wrote that love note in 2008, for I don’t think she knows she has such a letter anymore.   And if I had waited much longer to say these words, to describe my gratitude, she might not have understood.

She would ask in the Spring of 2019, did she really make a buttermilk pie last Fall?  Did she really refinish my dining table five years ago? She was not sure she once could, let alone had ever done so.  I have come to wonder: maybe not realizing what skill she had lost was easier than knowing she was losing it.  But that is just my rationalization of all our pain.

She would cry, sometimes on the phone or sometimes clinging to me in person, remembering that she once had a cat who had died unexpectedly twenty years ago. Though loved, this kitty was never her most beloved, but you would never have known this with the way she suddenly carried on. With Alzheimer’s, the recollection of Yogi’s death caused fresh pain like it was happening that moment. 

She has had many pets, and like me, treats them like babies, caring for them till the very end.  But somehow, the visual of finding Yogi dead under a crib she kept for her grandchildren, was stuck on a loop in her memory bank.  Nearly every time we meet, she complains that Dad won’t let her have a cat, and returns to Yogi’s loss.  Though I have argued that a pet will make her feel better, perhaps get her off this particular replay loop, I agree that Dad feels too overwhelmed to have to worry about a cat escaping or about caring for it, too. Who am I to judge how much he can handle?

But even with this emotional hallucinating, Mom was still my Mom.  Though less able to grasp all the nuances, less able to answer my, “What have you been up to this morning?” she still could talk to me.  I once could set her to conversing by bringing up anything she did recall, her parents, her childhood; though her memories were not accurate, with help, our discussions were still mother and daughter moments.

However, until the summer of 2019, my father had been shielding me, and the day I was forced to realized this was anguish. I knew she was changed, of course, but he had masked some sort of bigger transition from me.  

I felt bamboozled, like I lost the opportunity to say good-bye once more as my mother was leaving.

A few summers ago, we had taken her to see a piece of property we bought in Seagrove; she struggled with a menu at a beachside restaurant, masking this by complaining the room was just too dark to see, but she did eventually choose a dish. Later she was excited to walk the narrow lines of our slice of land.

Now, though she still appears to read, she will look and look at a menu, scanning it like it hides a secret. Servers are confused by this woman who demands ten minutes to read all the types of soda offered, telling themselves, don’t most people rattle off a drink without thinking? Mom is no longer aware that Diet decaf Coke is her favorite.  We must choose everything for her. She now warns me not to buy land at the beach because of “That horrible hurricane”, (Michael) forgetting a beach home is already in the works.  (I had fantasized that I could take her to her favorite place more often. . .)

And even though I was aware of all these essential changes, in the summer of 2019, I had believed she was still sending me emails and funny articles, she was still calling me;  in my mind I pictured her turning on her computer and perusing her email, or picking up the phone and pressing the buttons.  This communication was a sort of marker for me. . .Mom can still. . .

But then one day, last summer, taking her shopping, I found she did not know what credit cards were or how to use them.  She couldn’t recall that she had plenty of money in her wallet, so she worried over and over that she didn’t know how she could pay.  And my comments, “Don’t worry, Mom, I’ll pay,” didn’t calm her. 

She would circle one particular rack, pulling out the same, voluminous, brightly colored shirt to show me, forgetting immediately that I had just said, “Yes, that’s pretty, but it’s way too big for you.”  She’d twist about, gripping the Petite Small tag inside her collar, making sure that she wasn’t the same size as the shirt she wanted while I replaced it on a hanger. . .and then around the rack she’d go to do it all over again. 

She could recall each time that neck openings revealed size markers, but she could not recall she had just touched that shirt.

Interestingly, as she forgot what she had just held, she kept choosing the very one—XX-large, colorful—consistent taste, I guess.  I let this go on for a while, smiling through it for she was happy shopping the same rack for the same shirt.  But I was also heart broken. This was my first honest exposure to how far her brain had deteriorated.

When we returned home, in telling Dad about this, inadvertently, I discovered that she was not the one sending me email.  Dad was using her account, instead of his own. She was not the one dialing the phone; again, Dad was making the choice to call me, and handing her the phone.  Somewhere along the way, my mother had lost the ability to do so and I wasn’t informed. 

I had been holding onto how Mom could still. . . while she couldn’t.  Yet. . .yet, even then,  she was my Mom when Dad passed her the phone.

And then. . .poof. . .she wasn’t.  

Identity is so wrapped up in memory; knowing this person in front of me is not the same woman who accomplished so much, who had such a rich, multi-layered life, who raised me and taught me and loved me is a huge, painful loss, no easier than if she had died suddenly in a car crash.  And though friends and acquaintances will say, Oh, I’m sorry, how horrible when they hear Mom has Alzheimer’s, they are often picturing the strangeness they see in films, the sad absence of memory in some distant elderly relative they barely knew, or the difficulties the disease puts the victim’s caretakers through. 

They are not picturing a metaphorical death that my mother or her family suffers when the daily transition from herself to this other occurs. The double death of Alzheimer’s, first of the person, and then of the body.

A quick, literal death is shocking and gives families no room to say goodbye, yet in its wake comes an acknowledged, supportive grieving structure.  A slow death by cancer or other terminal illnesses is awful in its own way, but can allow family and the sufferer goodbyes as they near the end.  I have seen this process up close and personally as a hospice volunteer and as a relative.  However, with Alzheimer’s, there is that lengthy suffering, but no timely grief system in place, and miniscule social support.

There are also no true goodbyes. 

When victims are diagnosed, do you say—while they are still swearing that they are not losing their memories—“I love you, and it will suck to lose you;  I hate the fact that I’m losing you?” the way you can with other terminal illnesses? No, it is too soon for the victims and survivors.  I tried, but Mom, like most victims, adamantly argued that Alzheimer’s was not happening. Denial is one on humanity’s most powerful mechanisms. 

Victims, while still cognitively capable, want to avoid discussing their illness, so families find saying goodbye shunned.  But if you wait to say these words, will it be too late?  In truth, how do you say goodbye to someone who will live for years after they are gone.

You can say your good-byes when the time feels right, but no time ever feels right, because aside from denial, the victim is dealing with the unknown; there is no life expectancy date doctors can confidently offer. . .ten years, six, fifteen?   Plus, unlike with other terminal diseases, no Hospice takes them while they are still conscious of who their daughter is or even why she is sad.

When sufferers actually are “ready for hospice,” by that point, you don’t say to any person who can’t think straight: Hey, you used to be a different person and I miss that person.  Doing so only confuses them and could tragically result in that painful conversation becoming the loop their brain judders obsessively around.

Because of how different this disease is, the diagnoses of Alzheimer’s, the community’s mourning process, and the way  the medical world handles these patients are all wildly off kilter with the rest of healthcare’s other terminal illnesses.

Let’s say a cancer patient receives a six-months-to-live diagnosis.  Aside from the stages of grief, the sufferer and their families wonder, will I live that long?  What should I do now?  Will I suffer?  Will people reject me?  And doctors and family—along with a whole industry of caregivers from grief therapists, to oncologists, to visiting nurses—can assure victims that their pain will be managed, their loved ones will be there to take over.  And everyone can say goodbye as the time comes near and if not too late, the patient will realize the love.  Believe me, I’ve done this with family and, as a hospice volunteer, I have watched other grievers do this with their own family members.

With my sister-in-law’s cancer, there were doctors and nurses, and monthly and weekly visits centered around giving Lori a voice, around patient advocacy, and the dying process.  With Alzheimer’s, there is no doctor there to assure victims of any sort of management plan.  No one to watch over them but the people who love them. It’s: You have Alzheimer’s, take this med that does not work, see me in six months, when I will have no new info.  And by the way, if you need it, here’s an antidepressant.  The professionals are blaringly absent until the patient is barely able to feed herself, let alone know why anyone is there.

With Alzhemier’s, true, there come the same stages of grief as with any terminal diagnoses, and many of the same questions.  But for the victim, add on top, a debilitating fear of becoming a physical and financial burden for years, for often a decade or more.  And even worse, throw in the faulty worry of becoming an embarrassment, a clown, and the petrifying belief they will be abandoned in an abusive nursing home.   Victims of other terminal illnesses do not worry that their brains will fail them to the point where they can no longer self-advocate.

Thus, with Alzheimer’s the resulting denial is lengthier and floods into a time when the sufferer’s brain cannot grasp what’s coming. I have a friend suffering from MS who is actively working on his bucket list; right now, he’s on his way to a dog mush in Alaska. Check!  Alzheimer’s denial is so powerful, that embarking on such a plan feels like defeat at first, and becomes an impossibility later.  There was no way I could say to Mom four years ago, let’s go to Thailand this summer (before you forget what Thailand is.)  The same woman who threatened to take me out of her will if I ever again spoke of her crumbling memory? 

She simply asked me, “But why would we do that?”

Checking off a Things-to-do-before-I-Die list first requires acceptance.

For my husband’s sister, acceptance came in waves, and would disappear periodically.  As Lori neared succumbing to ovarian cancer, we all often pretended that she was going to be around the next Thanksgiving, a year later; she was going to travel to Hawaii with her buddies come summer. Still. . .even with the weird self-induced subterfuge, she walked into Hospice aware of herself and us, knew when we spoke to her on her deathbed, and knew who was speaking.   An Alzheimer’s patient just forgets why he is so angry and depressed long before final goodbyes.  Has no idea why there are random tears on his cheeks.  Meanwhile, though processing their own acceptance, families are suffering more, taking on a greater share of work, and both welcoming and fearing a death somewhere deep in the future.

By the time a patient comes seeking answers from professionals, they are typically in Stage 4 of the seven defined stages of Alzheimer’s, but doctors know that to continue enjoying life to the fullest is important.   Thus, because of the disease’s lengthy decline, Doctors want Alzheimer’s victims to focus on the good, to almost go into a sort of dismissal of the truth “for now” while they still can.  Meanwhile, they hand them a brochure listing all the Alzheimer’s stages the victim will pass through without stating they have already bypassed three or four, but then doctors add on quick, but ominous  suggestions that families get their affairs in order. 

The irony of doctors’ willingness to embrace a fugue-like denial of memory loss makes sense, for as I said,  victims are suffering and facing two deaths, one of the person and then one much, much later of the body.  So, “let’s not remember that we cannot remember” seems like a useful defense mechanism, especially since the stages can linger for years or rush like a hurricane through a brain.

No matter the doctor’s intention, this encouraged denial is an interference in the mourning process, as well.

Concurrently, just like the local Alzheimer’s support group leader who told me last year that it was too early to come to the Caregiver Grief sessions, group therapy is too early for many patients when they need it the most. Support groups for the actual Alzheimer’s patients are fewer and farther between than what is available for other diseases; a breast cancer sufferer has support groups galore, and she knows why she is there.   But, when an Alzheimer’s patient is able to know where she is, the sessions are too honest for people who still want to cling to the chance that their memory is not disappearing.  

And then when their memories are almost gone and there is no denying it, patients find the groups too difficult to navigate.  Imagine a room full of grievers who can’t recall why they are there or who the other people are. Imagine trying to organize these groups so that attendees are all at the same stage of memory loss. Impossible.

A quick internet search for support groups “near me” for cancer alone results in over 400 million results; plus, the platform prompts me to narrow my search to types of cancer, offering foundations for people with anything from Bladder to Pancreatic to Bone cancer.  The American Cancer Society’s page wants to help me so badly, that they break down all the different types of support I can receive, from transportation, to therapy, to babysitters, to end of life care.  Whatever I can think of, they have a group or a person ready to help. 

However, Google returns only 1% of those number of hits for Alzheimer’s in the Atlanta area.  Sure, there are far more cancer types compared to the various forms of dementia, so maybe that makes sense. But upon closer inspection I see that these available pages are often copies of each other,  mirroring what that one counselor had told me— how if Mom can still dress herself, it is too soon to come—and offering barely more than what was printed on the early, after-diagnoses brochures. Quick descriptions of what to expect and a hotline to call.

Looking for therapists who work with actual Alzheimer’s patients was even less productive: 57 thousand, exceptionally repetitious hits nationwide popped up.  But upon closer inspection, most offerings were incorrectly focused on caregivers not therapists, and included research centers who wanted study participants rather than help centers who wanted to help Mom.  Again, I imagine the greater availability of people ready to work with victims of other terminal illnesses is due to other patients’ survivability, their knowable future, the acceptance-while-still-cognitively-capable. 

The idea of therapy is to process, and to progress.  ALZ patients regress, and they lose their process; they don’t even remember process.

And frankly, I think so many people and professionals avoid dealing with dementia sufferers and their families because, holy crap, what if this were me? 

Thus, there simply is not the scaffolding among the industry and among the communities of friends to help families and victims face and conquer losses day-to-day. 

My close friend’s mother is diagnosed with stomach cancer, and we come out of the woodwork for a handful of weeks to babysit her grand-daughter while she takes her mother to chemo; we bake casseroles so she doesn’t have to cook after an emotional day, we call her with love and prayers, knowing there is an end in sight. . .suggesting that the hardest part will not last much longer.  Either her mother will live or will not.

But with Alzheimer’s, the system is out of whack.  Each part is the hardest part.  First, accepting that nothing cures this disease is tough, but then comes patients’ suffering as they realize they will lose their minds.  That becomes the hardest.   No. . .seeing them struggle to navigate the world with this deteriorated brain is harder.  Helping them like one helps a newborn is so much harder. . .Wait. . .is waking up and discovering you lost them, yet here their bodies still live the worst?   Maybe.  Finally, they still need care, serious, difficult caretaking, yet they don’t even know who is caring for them. That might be the hardest step of all.

When, then, in that sequence do friends bake casseroles. . .and for how long?  Seriously.

To be fair and honest, what help that the community does offer, exists only if the victim is willing to open up and share their diagnoses.  Even with open communication, what seems to be the norm is a patient’s close friends and sometimes even family members disappear, saying, “They don’t even know me, too weird; why should I bother.”  This has not yet happened to Mom, not fully.

God love her, my mother’s neighbor has never heard either of my parents utter the word Alzheimer’s, but Carole still attempts to take my mother for walks the length of their street every day.  No matter how my mother behaves, no matter that she cannot recall Carole’s name, Mom’s friend shows up to walk with a smile on her face.  Mom’s bridge team let her play much longer than she knew the bidding sequences until, frankly, a few other teammates needed nursing homes as well.  But still, even in these cases, no open-hearted circling-of-the-wagons occurs like garnered in other diseases. My father alone struggles to cook each night after corralling and protecting his wife all day with only my help in sight.  Is this because Mom has been so unwilling to discuss her diagnosis? Or is this because people forget how terminal this disease is because it takes so long?

The closest I have come to an open discussion with my mother of what she thinks about her disease was several years ago.  She was complaining about not being allowed to drive and how she didn’t like the way my father was treating her.   In other words, she was losing her abilities, and thereby her independence, and that was not sitting right with her though she never mentioned her memory or Alzheimer’s. The cause and effect of Dad taking her keys was nearly lost on Mom.  And though I knew Dad would always love her, I promised I would steal her away and keep her with me if my father got “too bad” because frankly, Dad can get “too bad.”  It is not easy being a caregiver.

“Don’t worry, Mom.  I love you and you can live with me anytime you want.  I will care for you as well as you have mothered me my whole life.”  Stilted, but true words to soothe her.

We sobbed and had trouble forming words for at least thirty minutes after that chat, just holding each other on my sofa.  But even then, notice on the surface, I was talking to her about “possible”  (pretend) spousal abuse rather than her disease.  Mom was not ready to discuss that her Alzheimer’s was why she could not drive, not ready to admit that I was losing her word-by-word, cell-by-cell.  She was still Mom and was not going to discuss a day in some future fearscape.  She would rather complain about Dad’s “temper”.  We mourned through stand-ins, not openly.

Alzheimer’s is not only a thief of the mind, but of the mourning process.  Kubler-Ross be damned.

Yes, my mother still knows I am her child though there was one moment last July when she wanted to know who was that man driving up front (my husband was taxiing my parents home); she was shocked when told that stranger was married to her daughter.  “I have a girl?” 

Later that day, she could even describe how she momentarily forgot who I was, able to remember not remembering: “It’s so weird.  I know who you are now.” 

That’s the funny thing about Alzheimer’s. It is not a steady, consistent decline.   She could play bridge as recently as Spring of 2019,  but cannot find the grocery store.  She cannot cook a meal, but can peel potatoes and boil water if I ask and hand her the proper utensils.  She can dress herself and matches her clothes like her life depends on it, blue pants, blue socks, blues shoes, blue scarf, blue earrings.  She can crack a smart-alec, witty retort, but have no idea what a comedian is.  Just like in healthy brains, there are clearer days than others.  Diet, sleep, exercise all matter.

But now, like a light switched off,  I realize that though she knows she has a daughter,  I can no longer talk to my best friend the way I always had.   When she does talk, she does not have the same expressions, the same spark in her Liz Taylor eyes.  She asked me oneday where did I get my curly hair.  “Did a stylist do it?”  Yes, I’m glad she can still say stylist.  But she doesn’t remember how her mother had curly hair; getting her to talk about herself or her past is nearly impossible now, for even the present is so fleeting to her.  If I talk to her about my sons,  I’m telling her a story about strangers. 

Often, she seems shifted into that space where many Alzheimer’s patients go:  the interested bystander who listens because they really don’t know who or what is going on, but don’t want it to show.  They become masters at finding excuses to hide their memory loss, until even that takes too much effort, and eventually say about everything, “Well. . .I don’t know about that.” 

This truth can open up all sorts of philosophical questions about identity and life:  Is “who we are” attached more to our thoughts and memories than our bodies?  Who is this person Mom is becoming?

And don’t confuse what I am saying.  I love this woman as much as I ever have, but the woman who was my mother is almost gone, and few around me understand.  It’s a loss people will not help me mourn for many years to come.   I love this woman still for all she has ever been, for all she has ever done or thought or felt.  And I love her because she needs my love more than ever. 

As far as we as a family have progressed in processing this tragedy, there is still something besides Mom that is missing:  Support in our grieving.

I do wish that other people knew to mourn with me today as I absorb that Mom “died” sometime recently without me knowing, knew to send heartfelt condolences and not wait for the day years from now when Mom’s passing will only be a relief from the prison of her own brain. But how does one announce this?  My mother died recently at an unknown hour.  But her body still lives?

And how do they respond?

There are few people willing to mourn with me now when the hurtful loss, her “death” is fresh and ongoing.  There is no custom to follow. No etiquette.  No whole page in the newspaper dedicated to such announcements.   There are no other deaths that occur unmarked, unrecorded beside perhaps prisoners of war, those missing in action or the unknown kidnapped.  Ironic since Alzheimer’s is a sort of captivity.

I’ve even heard people tell me these words:  At least she is alive. . .a phrase that implies the speaker’s pain is competitively far deeper because they recently lost someone to a literal death.

I write this to say, in honor of all families going through this, we need to develop a custom recognizing how mourning during Alzheimer’s destruction deviates from the norm.   Nothing about it is like other deaths, other grieving steps. Can whoever the new Emily Post is write new etiquette defining when to say what during the losses caused by Alzheimer’s or Dementia?

Seriously, if we can imbed new cultural customs like the ridiculous neighborhood Halloween Boo Bags or Christmas’s elf-on-a-shelf in what seems like mere nanoseconds, we certainly can change how we collectively mourn the loss and subsequent deaths of  262, 000 loved ones a year by dementia and Alzheimer’s.

Late fall, I just sat with Mom on my screened porch watching the last of the migrating hummingbirds fight over my red feeders.  We rarely spoke.

Birdwatching takes up a large chunk of her day, but now the hummers are all South. Yesterday, a Carolina Wren, her favorite bird for “It just looks like a cute, little a chipmunk,” kept checking out the seed tray.  Mom didn’t know what it was, or even that she had claimed it as her favorite bird, but she still enjoyed sitting quietly with me, tracing with her pointed finger how the wrens zip back and forth to the nearby oaks and the porch.

I’m currently in a wheelchair having shattered my right ankle and my left shoulder in a silly bicycle accident.  Dad was ready to drive home, and had come outside to collect Mom.  As we were moving to say good-bye at the door, Mom noticed the laces on my one good foot had come undone.   She stopped my wheels and squatted down. Dad literally whispered, “Ain’t no way she’s gonna do that,” convinced Mom no longer understood how to tie shoes.  But slowly and certainly, she looped one lace over and under and through. Tightening the bow, she patted my foot like she had done so many mornings decades ago.  “There you go!”

I know one day I will really have to say goodbye for good to this woman who only occasionally appears, and I hug her too long each time we part,  but for now,  I’m trying to celebrate that I can hold her and enjoy her presence. . .At least she’s alive.  Meanwhile, so few people in my life know what’s going on in our hearts.

Not SHOCKED, But Definitely BETRAYED

Why does every recent article about teachers and Covid19 begin with some rephrasing of “Shocked and Betrayed. . .”?  When have U.S. teachers NOT been shocked and betrayed, particularly those in states, like Georgia, where unions and strikes are illegal to government employees?  In the age of kings, teachers were servants if not outright slaves, and since then, continue to be  exploited with an imperial hand.  Publication1

There should be no shock now that these workers are once again treated as throw-aways, monkeys in a Covid19 experiment lab called public schools.

Teachers belong to the only profession where job eligibility requires one if not three separate degrees,  plus additional weeks of yearly Inservice credits, YET  they receive a yearly salary, for nearly half of their career, at the poverty level.  Often, they pay for those yearly certification updates themselves. Plus, they typically spend $500 or more to purchase supplies for the classroom when the districts do not provide them with more than one box of printer paper, a cartridge of ink,  and a handful of pens or pencils per year.

These degreed professionals—nearly 50% have a Master’s degree or higher— have had to fight for the right to actual rest breaks in a society where most jobs legally must allow employees one 30 minute break and two 15 minute breaks for an eight hour day.  Ask any cashier at Target. . .she gets to leave her job site, wander down to the local burger joint and relax for thirty or more minutes when she has an eight-hour shift.  Teachers literally had to sue in order to eat their lunches in a relaxed setting away from their students  (because eating alone with the kids is not a break from work, it is work. . .), yet this one and only break is still only 20 minutes or less long, and it must be enjoyed on campus. Teachers (along with nurses) also suffer the highest rate of bladder medical issues, for, without breaks, they cannot use the restroom “on command.”

Though everyone envies and judges teachers for their luxurious six-to-eight weeks of summer vacation, the public is oblivious of the hours all teachers work through school year. Teachers take everyone else’s full year’s worth of hours working in whatever career the public works (by some accounts Americans average approximately 2000 hours a year), and jam even more than that into 10 months.  Before I retired, my workday began at my desk by 6:30; I would rarely leave before 4:30, and my only break was the few minutes I had to shove my sandwich in my mouth during student lunch period.

Between classrooms and meetings, teachers work nine or ten hour days and are often forced to handle coaching and sponsorship duties beyond that for another 6-15 hours a week.  Then they go home to work, grading and prepping student assignments; what’s more, I would bet, all veteran teachers can share how many weekends they could not go to a show or hang with the kids at their soccer games because they still had that stack of papers on their desk.  That adds up often to 70 plus hour work weeks.  Again. . .extensive hours for a salary that, for years, remains near poverty level. Business insider reports that “In over 300 districts [nationwide], teachers earn a starting salary below $30,000.” And it takes up to a decade of experience to rise above that mark.

So yes, society leans heavily on the servant part of these public servants, treating them just as the Kings once did.

And do not even get me started on how every single teacher I know has had to endure hostile nastiness from parents and students alike.  I worked with a woman who was physically attacked twice (in separate years) by her entire classroom; another beloved “Teacher of the Year” winner was thrown to the ground and kicked during a lunchroom brawl right in front of me.  Do not get me wrong. . .most children are fabulous and their parents even more so, and they are the reason most teachers remain in this exploitative career.  But do not fool yourself into thinking life is all sunshiny glue and glitter in a classroom.

So the fact that Georgia’s Cherokee County  Public Schools system literally said to their faculty: If you fear the fact that we will not require masks, nor will we require social distancing, nor will we give you anything to clean your hands or your desks. . .Quit. . .should be no surprise.   CCPS Public Rep. Jacoby says: “ ‘We have informed all employees that should they want to resign, due to health, safety, or dependent care concerns, they will be allowed to resign without penalty, liquidated damages, or referral to the Georgia Professional Standards Commission for abandonment of contract.’ ”    How kind.  They won’t destroy a teacher’s future should she or he decide Covid19 is too dangerous.

They then explain how the county system will fill those blank positions by hiring those lessor candidates who did not get a job first time around.  And if they run out of willing certified teachers, they will take uncertified folks from the sub pool and stick them in.   By the way, to be a substitute in most systems only requires a high school diploma and a few hours of training.

Apparently, Teachers, are simply a warm bodies that school systems objectify.  Teachers serve a means to their political end.  Realize school systems are led by politicians and teachers and schools get them votes. . .that is all.  Teachers are not valued experts, but pawns.

This is not shocking.  This is not even a betrayal.  It is more of the same. . .