The Big Crap the Digital World Dumps on Culture: Brides, Children, and NYC…

Sure, I too once mocked how older folks dismiss the modern world.  Even the ball point pen was predicted to be the devilish downfall of humanity when it hit the scene…It will come for each of us: this disconnect with new “stuff.”

However, my complaints are not exactly about technological changes.  Not quite.  I have issues with ways culture is shifting because of technology…

Consider:  The “First Look” trend at weddings, newly designed by professional wedding photographers so that they do not have to be all that talented at capturing reality.  They can stage everything, like so many other things in our world are now staged, to avoid missing the moment when the groom first sees his bride in her wedding get-up. “What?” You ask, “Are you talking about?” 

My best girlfriend when getting remarried received a schedule from her photographer with a butt load of times penciled around the clock.  Apparently my pal is preparing for a photoshoot, not a wedding: 10 a.m. Bridal Breakfast, 12:30 pm Bridal Dress-up (where photographer sets up pictures of bride putting her hair up, swiping her eyelids with make-up, sliding into her dress), 1:45 Bridal Party  (where the fully ready bride, her family and her maidens all pose around some predetermined location,) 2:30 Groom’s Party (same), 4:30 Full Wedding Party, 5:30 Reception Untouched (staged photos of all the food, china and flower details before anyone arrives);  7:30 Married Couple Post Wedding  etc., etc..

Notice there are NO 6:30 Weddingtaking-place pictures, no vows-spoken shots.  On this photographer’s website there is not one candid photo of any weddings…And she was not alone.  This is the trend among wedding photography. 

But it’s the 3:30 First Look that really proves my point: the photographer sets up the groom to capture his face as bride appears in the perfect lighting, dressed in her gown long before the wedding ceremony;  said photographer retakes the shot until she is happy with the look on the Groom’s face. In other words, the actual “first look” photo, might not even be a first look, and it is definitely going to be something the groom contrives after all that pressure to react to “the dress.”

So why did they  even have a wedding ceremony then?  In fact, when they went to cut the cake, no one at the reception was even aware because apparently the only thing that mattered was whether the photographer got a good angle.  Guests literally didn’t know they were scarfing down facefulls of frosting until the tradition was almost over.  I told my friend, if all you wanted are pretty pictures, you should have saved yourself the money and just got married at the courthouse and hired this woman for your staged couple’s pictures. 

Have we gotten to where keep sake photo albums of the wedding outweigh the vows?  I see this as a direct result of the selfie trend, which is a side effect of our digital world.  One begat the other.  We’ve become a world where photos supplant experience.

Which leads me to a related complaint.  What the hell is going on with all the weird matchy-matchy women groups? Is this the adult version of friendship bracelets of yore?  My tight group of five girls (read Clique) in the 7th grade spool-knit rainbow bracelets to wear so everyone could know we were it.  At least four times this summer,  I’ve seen grown-ass women doing the same with clothing.

The bridal parties of uni-dressers were the worst, nearly cruel.  One group of about seven women showed up at a rooftop bar where my husband and I sat, all of them wearing very tiny, spaghetti-strap rompers.  The bride sported white, of course, while the rest were in black.  And let me tell you, not every body type can carry off sleeveless, cinch-waisted short-shorts.  No one looked like they were having fun; and the larger girls quite obviously were trying to hide behind the others at every possibility, ducking and weaving and fanning their fingers over their bare flesh as their eyes darted about the room.  The next day on the beach, a different crowd of nine young women showed up in matching bathing suits. (Nine! I’ll complain about that ridiculous number another day)   The bride had a dramatic, white bikini and carried a floatation device shaped like an engagement ring.  Of course, she was surrounded by her “maids” who had been forced into black bikinis patterned like the bride’s.  At least the women who might have preferred a different, more demure style could hide under the waves…

Somehow in both cases, the look-at-us outfits seemed to squash any spontaneous, natural connection between them.  They clearly were there to be seen—Oh, and to capture “clever” selfies of the bride and her coordinated stooges—but not to socialize with each other.

What is this weird need to be the center of attention while simultaneously forcing others to do your bidding?  People must not grasp the point of Bridezilla where producers mean to denigrate that selfish behavior, not anoint it…

My complaint about the outfits and the “first-look” photography are linked in more than one way.  Both disregard the point of the wedding ceremony.  Neither respect the purpose of the day.  Two people are literally standing before their God and promising to try and love and honor one another for the rest of their lives.  How does modelling for photographs all day long or forcing women to humiliate themselves in public just to gain attention fit into that supposed love?  Both reduce a wedding to a Photo Op and into social media fodder…

The modern loss of true meaning in order to capture an image depresses me.  Do these sorts of brides even feel the spiritual depth of gathering your friends to bear witness to your love?  Or do they say yes to the proposal so they will have photos for social media like those fools who order food they won’t eat just to snap a picture of it.

But then, I also recently saw several matchy-matchy groups of female (dare I say middle-aged) tourists—not bridal parties—one dressed in slinky banana-colored tops at the US Open:

Another all in pink at the Met.  So this staging of grown women cannot just be a spoiled, mean-spirited bride issue.  Either way, parading in matching “supposedly” sexy outfits seems to be an attempt to gain attention, either from the television cameras nearby, or just plain old social media…

And then, let’s talk about socializing for a minute.  Or rather… not socializing, the disconnect caused by modern technology.

Erik Pickerskill has a series of photographs where people pose how we typically use our cellphones, only their hands are empty.  They sit on their sofas, pause on the sidewalks, stand on the subways staring into their clenched, phoneless hands.  This art depicts who we really are now, disengaged from the world, unable to ever be alone with our thoughts, as we stare into our tiny screens. 

I had this artist in mind when I rode the parking tram to the airport.  Everyone around me was staring at their hands…I mean phones.  Noone was daydreaming as they looked out the window, or chatted with the stranger next to them.  Walking through Central Park, people jogged by looking at their phones, standing in line at the museum visitors looked at their phones, waiting online in Grand Central Station and its gorgeous Art Deco Lobby, tourists looked at their phones…

I worry that this generation coming up will have vast chunks of their brain missing…chunks that develop only when you must occupy yourself with daydreams and imagination…

What happens to us when we do not devote any time through our days to being alone with our thoughts or connecting to the people and world around us?  Even babies in strollers stare at phone screens not the trees, or the skyline, or the people nearby…

The worst example of this screen obsession, however, isn’t about daydreaming, it’s about parenting.

We sat in a café yesterday between separate tables where parents dined with their individual child.  On one side, a father took a seat across from his five-year-old son as mother parked their car.  As they waited for her, they ordered Croque Monsieur.  They pondered the Egyptian mummy they were about to see at New York’s Museum of Natural History, the boy asking if he could touch it and wondering why he couldn’t wake the mummy up.  They then explored the parking situation in the city and why there were plastic shields between the café’s tables and on and on.   Each looking the other in the eye, very human, Dad offered his son thoughtful answers and questions.  They even engaged with us for a minute over the merits of grilled cheese.    

At the opposite side of our table, a Mom arrived with her young daughter.  The child was carrying a knotted balloon-sculpture while Mom was staring into her phone.  Through lunch, Mom never broke eye contact with her screen, no matter how hard the daughter tried to block her view with that balloon doggy.  She gently batted Mom’s forehead, boop boop; she asked questions; she tried to show her how the balloon doggy could walk on the table.  She swatted at the phone, but Mom was soldered to it, only stopping to snap a smiling selfie of mother and child having a “grand, happy” lunch. The only time the little girl got any sincere eye contact or one-on-one attention was when the sweet waitress knelt down and to ask her important questions about her day.  (I wonder how often wait staff feels compelled to do this for our neglected children…)

The difference between the tables was astonishing. I worry…what will become of our young if most of them have parents like the little girl’s?  …And no, it was clear the Mom was not on some important, cannot-be-avoided phone conversation.  She was just more interested in whatever was on that screen than in her daughter.

And to make matters worse, what we are witnessing instead of engaging is all staged, not even real…like the viral video of the poodle almost drowning in the family pool before his buddy the pitbull rescues him, where it is obvious the dogs’ owner has set this scenario up from the get-go; we are obsessed with screen life, even faked.  Yes, we have been watching TV for nearly a century now, with its fictionalized theater.  But now, we are stuck on a 24/7 sort of distorted reality that is not real, not spontaneous, not felt…Will any bride who sees her keepsake “first-look” photos ever be able to trust that the expression captured on her groom’s face is genuine?  Will those ladies dressed in yellow have any honest memories of their trip to the open?  But most of all, will that child in the restaurant know she is worth more than imagery..?

So maybe I sound like whoever was once scared of the ballpoint pen, and then the typewriter and then the photocopier.  But something horrendous is happening due to being able to socialize through “insta” pictures and video.  We have become obsessed with imagery of ourselves and each other, avoiding real connections.  We take pictures of things we do not experience—food, smiles, vows, friendship—we know exactly what our best side is and are not embarrassed to fake-pose to present it, we force our friends into humiliating outfits and our dogs into life threatening situations, we stage our most intimate expressions, and worse, we ignore our children…without thought to what we are losing in the long run. 

For what?

Try going a whole day without thinking about how [fill-in-the-blank] will look on a screen.  Try sitting quietly in a park without your phone.  Try experiencing something real without posting a picture of it or socially cataloging it in someway, at all.  Can you?

Dead but Alive: Etiquette?

Ocean Sunset | Nature photography, Ocean sunset, Beautiful sunrise

My Mother died sometime early last year.  But no one sent our family any condolences.  No one shared a series of memorable moments or spoke at her funeral.  In fact,  I cannot even tell you when she actually left us.  My mother has Alzheimer’s.  And if you think saying she died though she still lives is being melodramatic, then you have never loved anyone who  succumbed to this horrible disease.  Her body is eighty.  Her mind is both childish and elderly; no age fits.

She was diagnosed five years ago through a spinal tap that showed she had particular proteins. Though not fool proof, these can be defining marker of ALZ.  However, I first noticed that something was up on a trip to the Gulf in the Summer of 2013.  

We both burn in the sun, her much faster than I, and we have both suffered small skin cancer surgeries, yet we refuse to stay away from the beach. We love the water so much that we prop ourselves under a fancy umbrella, coat ourselves with thick layers of zinc oxide like cream cheese on bagels, and stay put until nature drives us indoors. 

We planned to splurge on early dinners each evening. Though she had been to this beach a number of times, I noticed that she could never recall where our car was after each meal.  Gee, that happens to all of us sometimes, right? But this was every time we parked.  Nor could she understand why I turned left out of the condo lot when we drove to dinner.  Left was the only direction we could go and not hit the sea.  Worse. . .she often struggled to pull up certain words. “The. . .the. . .whatchya call the thing that. . .the the. . .” These were subtle clues that perhaps only her daughter would notice. 

My grandmother also had Alzheimer’s, a specific type of Dementia, so we knew word loss is a symptom. Gramma’s disease didn’t seem obvious until she was deep into her 80s.  Therefore, my mother’s apparent memory failure at 73 frightened me.  And her. So early. Too early. 

She was never one to lose control, yell in anger, but when, on our trip home, I tried to discuss how she was struggling with direction, she screamed that if I ever asked her about her memory again she’d cut me out of my parents’ will.  As if they have millions to pass down (They don’t), as if this would stop me from figuring out what was up (It didn’t).  She was in tears, and we didn’t speak the rest of the afternoon’s drive.  But I knew, and her aggressive fear supported my suspicions. 

Each small step off the Alzheimer’s cliff was harder to ignore and even harder to discuss.   

By Christmas, she gave me odd gifts, very unlike her to purchase, as if she did not know me.  This was my first sense of loss.  My mother was typically so astute and thoughtful about presents.  When I said so to a group, expecting comfort, one woman scoffed and told me I was being silly and jumping to conclusions, judging me as if perhaps, I were selfishly complaining about “weak” gifts, and not frightened for mother’s brain.  I couldn’t care less about the product. The act was was the issue.

By the next Spring of 2014, Mom would call me, worried about my health insurance.  I’d reassure her that I had great coverage.  And then a few days later my phone would ring: the same concern.  And reminding her that we repeated this conversation a few days earlier rarely ended well.

But. . .she was still Mom, still happily playing bridge, cooking, socializing, reading books and discussing the world with me.

My father made appointments the next Spring of 2015, when it was clear to him that she, the woman who introduced us to and then taught us how to use the personal computer and all its accessories years ago, fell victim to an email-slash-phone company scam.  After adjusting all their accounts to save them from fraud, Dad knew his wife of nearly 60 years was not completely herself.  Sometimes when you are that close to someone, recognizing the change is harder.   But still. . .Mom was Mom. 

I almost joined a support group in Atlanta eighteen months ago, but the leader of the center told me attending would simply scare me since my mother was still “with us” in terms of being independent and cognitively capable.  Sure, she couldn’t always think of the word for washing machine, but she’d laugh when I filled in the blank, and thank me, joking, “See, it’s just words I can’t find.  If you were always with me, I’d never have trouble. . .” 

I had watched my grandmother die with the disease at 92, so I understood what this group advocate meant.  However, my grandmother, though she lost her ability to speak or walk, never became violent or nasty, never roamed the halls. . .never became. . .a lump. There was a spark in her to the very end; possibly a heart attack took her and not the final stages of Alzheimer’s where the victim becomes totally disengaged and incapable of anything at all, even breathing.

The advocate I had contacted suggested I was not ready to listen to the horror stories that others might need to share in a group setting, for right then, my mother was still herself; she would call me,  still knew all her grandchildren’s names and mostly their ages, and what was up with each.  She still discussed my two cats and two dogs like her own family, wishing she could take them home, make them her pets.

Yet, we were all reeling, knowing what was descending on my mother and our lives. Bit by bit she was losing herself. And there was zero help for these early stages.

My father took Mom to visit her brother and his wife in Virginia the summer of ‘17.  Mom knew who they were,  but did not know their children anymore. My Aunt thought Mom acted much better than I had described. My Uncle was shocked at how badly his sister had failed.  She was at the point of repeating herself, retelling the same story in mere minutes, and this threw him for a loop. But worst of all, Mom was very aware that this awful disease was stealing her away, and she felt shamed that they could see it.  

I traveled with her to her brother’s home again Spring 2019, and though both remarked that Mom seemed more relaxed and not much “worse,” she would cry herself to sleep next to me, in the guestroom bed we shared, moaning how I was the baby and she was the Mom, not the other way around.

“This isn’t right,” she complained.  

The fact that I had to navigate ticketing and security and boarding for her as we traveled through Hartsfield to Newport News, and worse, had to poke through her suitcase—did she have enough undies?  Socks? Was she packed properly for cooler weather?—didn’t feel right to Mom.  I told her this was the circle of life while I rubbed her back, helping her fall asleep.

“Mom,” I said, softly in the dark,  “Sometimes a Daughter gets to care for her Mom.”  Though I knew her emotions were part of the disease and not necessarily part of her logic, I still tried to reason with her, calm her with these words.

My mother had always been the most capable, talented, clever woman I’ve ever known.  If there was something she wanted to figure out, she did.  If there was a skill she wanted to learn, she became an expert:  Sew, reupholster, keep the accounts, invest, revamp the computer, strip furniture, knit, crochet, paint, bake, garden, bridge. . .parent. . .all while also making a serious living as a real estate broker before she retired.  Her husband in the Air Force when we were growing up, she often reared us alone, kept a beautiful home and then packed up and traveled the world whenever Dad was reassigned.  She was smart and witty, and insightful.  And though I am her grown daughter, and have inherited many of these traits—she made me self-confident—I still leaned on her for her wisdom and companionship; I still desperately want to. 

And to realize that slowly, but surely, she could no longer do these things was killing her emotionally.  At first, after diagnosis, she could remember being once able to do just about anything,  but knew she could not recall how to apply those talents now;  this fact depressed her.  Up till a few years ago, she often pulled out a letter I had written to her on her 50th wedding anniversary,  telling her how admiring I was of all of her traits. . .traits I then listed in detail for her. I described how she was the greatest role model anyone could have.

“I love this letter. Did you mean all this?” she’d ask.  Then later, as her memory worsened and these skills faded like a dream, she would read and wonder, “How did I do all these things?”

I’m glad I wrote that love note in 2008, for I don’t think she knows she has such a letter anymore.   And if I had waited much longer to say these words, to describe my gratitude, she might not have understood.

She would ask in the Spring of 2019, did she really make a buttermilk pie last Fall?  Did she really refinish my dining table five years ago? She was not sure she once could, let alone had ever done so.  I have come to wonder: maybe not realizing what skill she had lost was easier than knowing she was losing it.  But that is just my rationalization of all our pain.

She would cry, sometimes on the phone or sometimes clinging to me in person, remembering that she once had a cat who had died unexpectedly twenty years ago. Though loved, this kitty was never her most beloved, but you would never have known this with the way she suddenly carried on. With Alzheimer’s, the recollection of Yogi’s death caused fresh pain like it was happening that moment. 

She has had many pets, and like me, treats them like babies, caring for them till the very end.  But somehow, the visual of finding Yogi dead under a crib she kept for her grandchildren, was stuck on a loop in her memory bank.  Nearly every time we meet, she complains that Dad won’t let her have a cat, and returns to Yogi’s loss.  Though I have argued that a pet will make her feel better, perhaps get her off this particular replay loop, I agree that Dad feels too overwhelmed to have to worry about a cat escaping or about caring for it, too. Who am I to judge how much he can handle?

But even with this emotional hallucinating, Mom was still my Mom.  Though less able to grasp all the nuances, less able to answer my, “What have you been up to this morning?” she still could talk to me.  I once could set her to conversing by bringing up anything she did recall, her parents, her childhood; though her memories were not accurate, with help, our discussions were still mother and daughter moments.

However, until the summer of 2019, my father had been shielding me, and the day I was forced to realized this was anguish. I knew she was changed, of course, but he had masked some sort of bigger transition from me.  

I felt bamboozled, like I lost the opportunity to say good-bye once more as my mother was leaving.

A few summers ago, we had taken her to see a piece of property we bought in Seagrove; she struggled with a menu at a beachside restaurant, masking this by complaining the room was just too dark to see, but she did eventually choose a dish. Later she was excited to walk the narrow lines of our slice of land.

Now, though she still appears to read, she will look and look at a menu, scanning it like it hides a secret. Servers are confused by this woman who demands ten minutes to read all the types of soda offered, telling themselves, don’t most people rattle off a drink without thinking? Mom is no longer aware that Diet decaf Coke is her favorite.  We must choose everything for her. She now warns me not to buy land at the beach because of “That horrible hurricane”, (Michael) forgetting a beach home is already in the works.  (I had fantasized that I could take her to her favorite place more often. . .)

And even though I was aware of all these essential changes, in the summer of 2019, I had believed she was still sending me emails and funny articles, she was still calling me;  in my mind I pictured her turning on her computer and perusing her email, or picking up the phone and pressing the buttons.  This communication was a sort of marker for me. . .Mom can still. . .

But then one day, last summer, taking her shopping, I found she did not know what credit cards were or how to use them.  She couldn’t recall that she had plenty of money in her wallet, so she worried over and over that she didn’t know how she could pay.  And my comments, “Don’t worry, Mom, I’ll pay,” didn’t calm her. 

She would circle one particular rack, pulling out the same, voluminous, brightly colored shirt to show me, forgetting immediately that I had just said, “Yes, that’s pretty, but it’s way too big for you.”  She’d twist about, gripping the Petite Small tag inside her collar, making sure that she wasn’t the same size as the shirt she wanted while I replaced it on a hanger. . .and then around the rack she’d go to do it all over again. 

She could recall each time that neck openings revealed size markers, but she could not recall she had just touched that shirt.

Interestingly, as she forgot what she had just held, she kept choosing the very one—XX-large, colorful—consistent taste, I guess.  I let this go on for a while, smiling through it for she was happy shopping the same rack for the same shirt.  But I was also heart broken. This was my first honest exposure to how far her brain had deteriorated.

When we returned home, in telling Dad about this, inadvertently, I discovered that she was not the one sending me email.  Dad was using her account, instead of his own. She was not the one dialing the phone; again, Dad was making the choice to call me, and handing her the phone.  Somewhere along the way, my mother had lost the ability to do so and I wasn’t informed. 

I had been holding onto how Mom could still. . . while she couldn’t.  Yet. . .yet, even then,  she was my Mom when Dad passed her the phone.

And then. . .poof. . .she wasn’t.  

Identity is so wrapped up in memory; knowing this person in front of me is not the same woman who accomplished so much, who had such a rich, multi-layered life, who raised me and taught me and loved me is a huge, painful loss, no easier than if she had died suddenly in a car crash.  And though friends and acquaintances will say, Oh, I’m sorry, how horrible when they hear Mom has Alzheimer’s, they are often picturing the strangeness they see in films, the sad absence of memory in some distant elderly relative they barely knew, or the difficulties the disease puts the victim’s caretakers through. 

They are not picturing a metaphorical death that my mother or her family suffers when the daily transition from herself to this other occurs. The double death of Alzheimer’s, first of the person, and then of the body.

A quick, literal death is shocking and gives families no room to say goodbye, yet in its wake comes an acknowledged, supportive grieving structure.  A slow death by cancer or other terminal illnesses is awful in its own way, but can allow family and the sufferer goodbyes as they near the end.  I have seen this process up close and personally as a hospice volunteer and as a relative.  However, with Alzheimer’s, there is that lengthy suffering, but no timely grief system in place, and miniscule social support.

There are also no true goodbyes. 

When victims are diagnosed, do you say—while they are still swearing that they are not losing their memories—“I love you, and it will suck to lose you;  I hate the fact that I’m losing you?” the way you can with other terminal illnesses? No, it is too soon for the victims and survivors.  I tried, but Mom, like most victims, adamantly argued that Alzheimer’s was not happening. Denial is one on humanity’s most powerful mechanisms. 

Victims, while still cognitively capable, want to avoid discussing their illness, so families find saying goodbye shunned.  But if you wait to say these words, will it be too late?  In truth, how do you say goodbye to someone who will live for years after they are gone.

You can say your good-byes when the time feels right, but no time ever feels right, because aside from denial, the victim is dealing with the unknown; there is no life expectancy date doctors can confidently offer. . .ten years, six, fifteen?   Plus, unlike with other terminal diseases, no Hospice takes them while they are still conscious of who their daughter is or even why she is sad.

When sufferers actually are “ready for hospice,” by that point, you don’t say to any person who can’t think straight: Hey, you used to be a different person and I miss that person.  Doing so only confuses them and could tragically result in that painful conversation becoming the loop their brain judders obsessively around.

Because of how different this disease is, the diagnoses of Alzheimer’s, the community’s mourning process, and the way  the medical world handles these patients are all wildly off kilter with the rest of healthcare’s other terminal illnesses.

Let’s say a cancer patient receives a six-months-to-live diagnosis.  Aside from the stages of grief, the sufferer and their families wonder, will I live that long?  What should I do now?  Will I suffer?  Will people reject me?  And doctors and family—along with a whole industry of caregivers from grief therapists, to oncologists, to visiting nurses—can assure victims that their pain will be managed, their loved ones will be there to take over.  And everyone can say goodbye as the time comes near and if not too late, the patient will realize the love.  Believe me, I’ve done this with family and, as a hospice volunteer, I have watched other grievers do this with their own family members.

With my sister-in-law’s cancer, there were doctors and nurses, and monthly and weekly visits centered around giving Lori a voice, around patient advocacy, and the dying process.  With Alzheimer’s, there is no doctor there to assure victims of any sort of management plan.  No one to watch over them but the people who love them. It’s: You have Alzheimer’s, take this med that does not work, see me in six months, when I will have no new info.  And by the way, if you need it, here’s an antidepressant.  The professionals are blaringly absent until the patient is barely able to feed herself, let alone know why anyone is there.

With Alzhemier’s, true, there come the same stages of grief as with any terminal diagnoses, and many of the same questions.  But for the victim, add on top, a debilitating fear of becoming a physical and financial burden for years, for often a decade or more.  And even worse, throw in the faulty worry of becoming an embarrassment, a clown, and the petrifying belief they will be abandoned in an abusive nursing home.   Victims of other terminal illnesses do not worry that their brains will fail them to the point where they can no longer self-advocate.

Thus, with Alzheimer’s the resulting denial is lengthier and floods into a time when the sufferer’s brain cannot grasp what’s coming. I have a friend suffering from MS who is actively working on his bucket list; right now, he’s on his way to a dog mush in Alaska. Check!  Alzheimer’s denial is so powerful, that embarking on such a plan feels like defeat at first, and becomes an impossibility later.  There was no way I could say to Mom four years ago, let’s go to Thailand this summer (before you forget what Thailand is.)  The same woman who threatened to take me out of her will if I ever again spoke of her crumbling memory? 

She simply asked me, “But why would we do that?”

Checking off a Things-to-do-before-I-Die list first requires acceptance.

For my husband’s sister, acceptance came in waves, and would disappear periodically.  As Lori neared succumbing to ovarian cancer, we all often pretended that she was going to be around the next Thanksgiving, a year later; she was going to travel to Hawaii with her buddies come summer. Still. . .even with the weird self-induced subterfuge, she walked into Hospice aware of herself and us, knew when we spoke to her on her deathbed, and knew who was speaking.   An Alzheimer’s patient just forgets why he is so angry and depressed long before final goodbyes.  Has no idea why there are random tears on his cheeks.  Meanwhile, though processing their own acceptance, families are suffering more, taking on a greater share of work, and both welcoming and fearing a death somewhere deep in the future.

By the time a patient comes seeking answers from professionals, they are typically in Stage 4 of the seven defined stages of Alzheimer’s, but doctors know that to continue enjoying life to the fullest is important.   Thus, because of the disease’s lengthy decline, Doctors want Alzheimer’s victims to focus on the good, to almost go into a sort of dismissal of the truth “for now” while they still can.  Meanwhile, they hand them a brochure listing all the Alzheimer’s stages the victim will pass through without stating they have already bypassed three or four, but then doctors add on quick, but ominous  suggestions that families get their affairs in order. 

The irony of doctors’ willingness to embrace a fugue-like denial of memory loss makes sense, for as I said,  victims are suffering and facing two deaths, one of the person and then one much, much later of the body.  So, “let’s not remember that we cannot remember” seems like a useful defense mechanism, especially since the stages can linger for years or rush like a hurricane through a brain.

No matter the doctor’s intention, this encouraged denial is an interference in the mourning process, as well.

Concurrently, just like the local Alzheimer’s support group leader who told me last year that it was too early to come to the Caregiver Grief sessions, group therapy is too early for many patients when they need it the most. Support groups for the actual Alzheimer’s patients are fewer and farther between than what is available for other diseases; a breast cancer sufferer has support groups galore, and she knows why she is there.   But, when an Alzheimer’s patient is able to know where she is, the sessions are too honest for people who still want to cling to the chance that their memory is not disappearing.  

And then when their memories are almost gone and there is no denying it, patients find the groups too difficult to navigate.  Imagine a room full of grievers who can’t recall why they are there or who the other people are. Imagine trying to organize these groups so that attendees are all at the same stage of memory loss. Impossible.

A quick internet search for support groups “near me” for cancer alone results in over 400 million results; plus, the platform prompts me to narrow my search to types of cancer, offering foundations for people with anything from Bladder to Pancreatic to Bone cancer.  The American Cancer Society’s page wants to help me so badly, that they break down all the different types of support I can receive, from transportation, to therapy, to babysitters, to end of life care.  Whatever I can think of, they have a group or a person ready to help. 

However, Google returns only 1% of those number of hits for Alzheimer’s in the Atlanta area.  Sure, there are far more cancer types compared to the various forms of dementia, so maybe that makes sense. But upon closer inspection I see that these available pages are often copies of each other,  mirroring what that one counselor had told me— how if Mom can still dress herself, it is too soon to come—and offering barely more than what was printed on the early, after-diagnoses brochures. Quick descriptions of what to expect and a hotline to call.

Looking for therapists who work with actual Alzheimer’s patients was even less productive: 57 thousand, exceptionally repetitious hits nationwide popped up.  But upon closer inspection, most offerings were incorrectly focused on caregivers not therapists, and included research centers who wanted study participants rather than help centers who wanted to help Mom.  Again, I imagine the greater availability of people ready to work with victims of other terminal illnesses is due to other patients’ survivability, their knowable future, the acceptance-while-still-cognitively-capable. 

The idea of therapy is to process, and to progress.  ALZ patients regress, and they lose their process; they don’t even remember process.

And frankly, I think so many people and professionals avoid dealing with dementia sufferers and their families because, holy crap, what if this were me? 

Thus, there simply is not the scaffolding among the industry and among the communities of friends to help families and victims face and conquer losses day-to-day. 

My close friend’s mother is diagnosed with stomach cancer, and we come out of the woodwork for a handful of weeks to babysit her grand-daughter while she takes her mother to chemo; we bake casseroles so she doesn’t have to cook after an emotional day, we call her with love and prayers, knowing there is an end in sight. . .suggesting that the hardest part will not last much longer.  Either her mother will live or will not.

But with Alzheimer’s, the system is out of whack.  Each part is the hardest part.  First, accepting that nothing cures this disease is tough, but then comes patients’ suffering as they realize they will lose their minds.  That becomes the hardest.   No. . .seeing them struggle to navigate the world with this deteriorated brain is harder.  Helping them like one helps a newborn is so much harder. . .Wait. . .is waking up and discovering you lost them, yet here their bodies still live the worst?   Maybe.  Finally, they still need care, serious, difficult caretaking, yet they don’t even know who is caring for them. That might be the hardest step of all.

When, then, in that sequence do friends bake casseroles. . .and for how long?  Seriously.

To be fair and honest, what help that the community does offer, exists only if the victim is willing to open up and share their diagnoses.  Even with open communication, what seems to be the norm is a patient’s close friends and sometimes even family members disappear, saying, “They don’t even know me, too weird; why should I bother.”  This has not yet happened to Mom, not fully.

God love her, my mother’s neighbor has never heard either of my parents utter the word Alzheimer’s, but Carole still attempts to take my mother for walks the length of their street every day.  No matter how my mother behaves, no matter that she cannot recall Carole’s name, Mom’s friend shows up to walk with a smile on her face.  Mom’s bridge team let her play much longer than she knew the bidding sequences until, frankly, a few other teammates needed nursing homes as well.  But still, even in these cases, no open-hearted circling-of-the-wagons occurs like garnered in other diseases. My father alone struggles to cook each night after corralling and protecting his wife all day with only my help in sight.  Is this because Mom has been so unwilling to discuss her diagnosis? Or is this because people forget how terminal this disease is because it takes so long?

The closest I have come to an open discussion with my mother of what she thinks about her disease was several years ago.  She was complaining about not being allowed to drive and how she didn’t like the way my father was treating her.   In other words, she was losing her abilities, and thereby her independence, and that was not sitting right with her though she never mentioned her memory or Alzheimer’s. The cause and effect of Dad taking her keys was nearly lost on Mom.  And though I knew Dad would always love her, I promised I would steal her away and keep her with me if my father got “too bad” because frankly, Dad can get “too bad.”  It is not easy being a caregiver.

“Don’t worry, Mom.  I love you and you can live with me anytime you want.  I will care for you as well as you have mothered me my whole life.”  Stilted, but true words to soothe her.

We sobbed and had trouble forming words for at least thirty minutes after that chat, just holding each other on my sofa.  But even then, notice on the surface, I was talking to her about “possible”  (pretend) spousal abuse rather than her disease.  Mom was not ready to discuss that her Alzheimer’s was why she could not drive, not ready to admit that I was losing her word-by-word, cell-by-cell.  She was still Mom and was not going to discuss a day in some future fearscape.  She would rather complain about Dad’s “temper”.  We mourned through stand-ins, not openly.

Alzheimer’s is not only a thief of the mind, but of the mourning process.  Kubler-Ross be damned.

Yes, my mother still knows I am her child though there was one moment last July when she wanted to know who was that man driving up front (my husband was taxiing my parents home); she was shocked when told that stranger was married to her daughter.  “I have a girl?” 

Later that day, she could even describe how she momentarily forgot who I was, able to remember not remembering: “It’s so weird.  I know who you are now.” 

That’s the funny thing about Alzheimer’s. It is not a steady, consistent decline.   She could play bridge as recently as Spring of 2019,  but cannot find the grocery store.  She cannot cook a meal, but can peel potatoes and boil water if I ask and hand her the proper utensils.  She can dress herself and matches her clothes like her life depends on it, blue pants, blue socks, blues shoes, blue scarf, blue earrings.  She can crack a smart-alec, witty retort, but have no idea what a comedian is.  Just like in healthy brains, there are clearer days than others.  Diet, sleep, exercise all matter.

But now, like a light switched off,  I realize that though she knows she has a daughter,  I can no longer talk to my best friend the way I always had.   When she does talk, she does not have the same expressions, the same spark in her Liz Taylor eyes.  She asked me oneday where did I get my curly hair.  “Did a stylist do it?”  Yes, I’m glad she can still say stylist.  But she doesn’t remember how her mother had curly hair; getting her to talk about herself or her past is nearly impossible now, for even the present is so fleeting to her.  If I talk to her about my sons,  I’m telling her a story about strangers. 

Often, she seems shifted into that space where many Alzheimer’s patients go:  the interested bystander who listens because they really don’t know who or what is going on, but don’t want it to show.  They become masters at finding excuses to hide their memory loss, until even that takes too much effort, and eventually say about everything, “Well. . .I don’t know about that.” 

This truth can open up all sorts of philosophical questions about identity and life:  Is “who we are” attached more to our thoughts and memories than our bodies?  Who is this person Mom is becoming?

And don’t confuse what I am saying.  I love this woman as much as I ever have, but the woman who was my mother is almost gone, and few around me understand.  It’s a loss people will not help me mourn for many years to come.   I love this woman still for all she has ever been, for all she has ever done or thought or felt.  And I love her because she needs my love more than ever. 

As far as we as a family have progressed in processing this tragedy, there is still something besides Mom that is missing:  Support in our grieving.

I do wish that other people knew to mourn with me today as I absorb that Mom “died” sometime recently without me knowing, knew to send heartfelt condolences and not wait for the day years from now when Mom’s passing will only be a relief from the prison of her own brain. But how does one announce this?  My mother died recently at an unknown hour.  But her body still lives?

And how do they respond?

There are few people willing to mourn with me now when the hurtful loss, her “death” is fresh and ongoing.  There is no custom to follow. No etiquette.  No whole page in the newspaper dedicated to such announcements.   There are no other deaths that occur unmarked, unrecorded beside perhaps prisoners of war, those missing in action or the unknown kidnapped.  Ironic since Alzheimer’s is a sort of captivity.

I’ve even heard people tell me these words:  At least she is alive. . .a phrase that implies the speaker’s pain is competitively far deeper because they recently lost someone to a literal death.

I write this to say, in honor of all families going through this, we need to develop a custom recognizing how mourning during Alzheimer’s destruction deviates from the norm.   Nothing about it is like other deaths, other grieving steps. Can whoever the new Emily Post is write new etiquette defining when to say what during the losses caused by Alzheimer’s or Dementia?

Seriously, if we can imbed new cultural customs like the ridiculous neighborhood Halloween Boo Bags or Christmas’s elf-on-a-shelf in what seems like mere nanoseconds, we certainly can change how we collectively mourn the loss and subsequent deaths of  262, 000 loved ones a year by dementia and Alzheimer’s.

Late fall, I just sat with Mom on my screened porch watching the last of the migrating hummingbirds fight over my red feeders.  We rarely spoke.

Birdwatching takes up a large chunk of her day, but now the hummers are all South. Yesterday, a Carolina Wren, her favorite bird for “It just looks like a cute, little a chipmunk,” kept checking out the seed tray.  Mom didn’t know what it was, or even that she had claimed it as her favorite bird, but she still enjoyed sitting quietly with me, tracing with her pointed finger how the wrens zip back and forth to the nearby oaks and the porch.

I’m currently in a wheelchair having shattered my right ankle and my left shoulder in a silly bicycle accident.  Dad was ready to drive home, and had come outside to collect Mom.  As we were moving to say good-bye at the door, Mom noticed the laces on my one good foot had come undone.   She stopped my wheels and squatted down. Dad literally whispered, “Ain’t no way she’s gonna do that,” convinced Mom no longer understood how to tie shoes.  But slowly and certainly, she looped one lace over and under and through. Tightening the bow, she patted my foot like she had done so many mornings decades ago.  “There you go!”

I know one day I will really have to say goodbye for good to this woman who only occasionally appears, and I hug her too long each time we part,  but for now,  I’m trying to celebrate that I can hold her and enjoy her presence. . .At least she’s alive.  Meanwhile, so few people in my life know what’s going on in our hearts.

The Lost Art of Learning through ‘Free Range Parenting’

water nature person people girl explore mud puddle soil child family children out interaction tadpoles water based paints

I was a lucky girl.  My parents not only allowed me to play outdoors freely, they often demanded I go outside and find something to do:  Don’t return until the streetlights flick on.    Reading an article recently in The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/04/free-range-parenting/557051/) that discusses the dissonance between classes and races when it comes to this “new” concept called “Free Range parenting,” I had to laugh.  While the author makes a valid and stimulating point, I was thinking about her lost opportunity to discuss the benefits of this “Free range parenting.”  I mean, for millennia, parents of all races and social strata have practiced it until the aberration of the 1990s when fearful parents began to cling to their children and control their every move.

Luckily, for the sake of a child’s creativity and intelligence, as well as the sake of teachers everywhere, we are swinging back to allowing our children to play like I did as a child.

Typically, when people criticize today’s lack of childhood “free” play, they target organized sports because they believe there are lessons in relationships and authority lost in the modern multitude of organized teams, today’s prime, often forced, activity for children and their parents.   However, the benefits I gained through “free-range” playing were not only an understanding of interpersonal dynamics, but also the foundations of a budding scientist and artist, maybe even an academic.

In my adventures outdoors, I set shoe box traps for rabbits, laid out dandelion pulp for mice and brought home accidentally dug up baby moles. We rescued baby birds and placed them gently in nests, then would hide, waiting to make sure their mothers returned; they always did.  My friends and I captured all sorts of insects: lady bugs, red and black ants, daddy long legs, pill bugs, deadly black widows, trapdoor spiders, bumble bees, honey bees, hornets, wasps. . .We played with most and killed the scariest, smooshing them when we were too young to respect their rights.

Various reptiles and amphibians amazed us, causing us to sit still and watch them hunt.  My brother and I would scoop up frog eggs or new tadpoles and bring them home to watch them gain their legs and lose their tails, returning them to ponds when they were hopping frogs.  We’d attempt to rescue lizards who gave up their own tails when our cats grabbed them excitedly, but more often the speedy reptiles would keep on trucking sure to grow more. . .All of this taught us naturally the foundations often illuminated in early biology lessons: exoskeleton, endoskeleton, regeneration, eggs versus live birth, mammal versus reptile, etc.

While left to our own entertainment, we kids would find chunks of quartz that we thought were diamonds.  When my father told us where we might find more, we’d try to break open rocks searching for what treasure might be inside. How many  pirate, explorer fantasies did we act out that developed our literary sense. Pieces of mica that looked like mirrors and glass made us think, hmm, is this how a mirror is made? Did this lead to the invention of glass?  Shale that we could crunch with the tires of our bikes made us feel as powerful as superheroes. The coal that kicked up when we were walking on forbidden train tracks was so pure and black, making us wonder, really? Future diamonds?

We’d pick up chalk-like rocks to draw on the tarmac, marking our four square and hopscotch games, even the bases for kickball.   And of course, sand and mud were everyone’s favorite media.   A girlfriend and I used to shape figurines of ladybugs and snowmen out of the clay in our yards, paint them with our cheap tempura paints, and try to sell our artwork by the side of the road in front of our house.   Imagine how much more interesting geology lessons are with this personal knowledge of the variety of rocks that make up Earth.

And then comes the blending of geology and physics that I learned on my own.    My friends and I played in creeks, looking for crawdaddies, racing leaf boats, building dams.  We built castles and motes and canals in the sand. The movement of water, creeks, and rivers, brooks and ponds, even oceans and tides all showed us the power and etherealness of water.  The weight of it, the random choice that it takes as it tracks through our fingers, the holes and patterns that it makes in the rocky, sandy, mucky edges and piles of pepples  held our imagination.  The power water has to move and float us and suck us under was wonderfully frightening.  With these experiences I could easily understand what the teacher told me about erosion and flooding and water tables beneath the ground.

In the warming Spring, we’d race one another, rolling down grassy hills or skating too fast around curves.  We’d climb trees, sometimes falling from too high only to have the the wind knocked out of us.  We’d build teeter totters out of logs and rocks and ledges where we could balance and play king of the hill. Or we’d grab onto thick vines to swing across what we imagined were deep ravines, pretending we were Spiderman. My brother and I would ride our bikes into ever shrinking circles or figure eights, losing control when the wheels were moving way too slowly.

All this movement, whether we knew it or not, gave us a personal understanding of gravity, weights and balances.

In fact, when my pal Bitt Nelson rode his bike over a ramp we had set on a pile of sand at a construction site, and flew too far, only to bash his face on a sand loader, forcing his front teeth into his sinuses, we certainly adjusted ourselves.  We didn’t stop riding, but we learned faster than he ran home crying what we had to change not to repeat his catastrophe.

Image result for images of child riding bike over ramp

And when summer came, sitting on hot car hoods, standing in shade to find relief from the scorching sun, noticing how much hotter the black tar is versus the white painted line down the middle of the road, the cool of grass, the heat of concrete, the burn of asphalt, we learned quickly about heat transfer and what could relieve it.  We learned the simple exhaustion that comes from spending the whole day physically rushing and rough housing and playing, planting, digging, climbing.  How hungry we’d get playing and then begging our mothers for something to snack on, assuring her it would not ruin our dinner, quickly understanding why breakfast is the most important meal of the day.  All these moments created a vague knowledge of energy.

Years ago, when we played our disorganized sports-the impromptu baseball and football games run by only children- true. . .we learned negotiation and authority as people do say, but also the geometry of boundaries, the physics of messing around with a ball. Sometimes games were not impromptu but scheduled, by us, for us.  See you Saturday, right?  Behind the Olsen’s house? 

We figured things out ourselves, like what qualities draw others to a person, like those in Brian Culpepper who was often our favorite captain of street football games or meadow baseball.  Why was adorable Theresa Olsen always picked last in games of football? (Not because she was too slow or too uncoordinated or even too unpopular. . .she was finicky and prissy and whined too much.) Yet we let her play, for we also learned to be nice from each other, allowing the little kids who could never score join the teams because they were ours, a part of our neighborhood.  We shared which neighbor’s yard was welcoming and which neighbor was off limits.  We’d say, Don’t hit it so hard that it goes into Herr Golembush’s yard, don’t run so fast that you can’t stop before you slam into the Nelson’s rose bushes.  The Base is the yellow yield sign, the ball is a foul if it passes the camellias. . .

How often when they play an organized team sport are today’s children welcome to just goof around and test the ball?  Seeing how fast the ball could roll up, down, or over a hill, how fast hitting it squarely mattered, the arc of the hit, the lob, the toss, the strength of the bounce, the angle of the bounce. . .They are told how to hit in today’s games.  And do they learn which player is the best at the game themselves without being told?  Or whose yard is the best for that game that day?  Or who is on whose team?  Almost never.  Adults decide the who, what, where, when and why of each sport, directing children on how slow,  how fast to play, and even what to see and what not to see.

I suggest not only should children play disorganized sports with no adult supervision, but just play.  Just simple, imagination-full play.  Yes, The Atlantic makes a valid point about the unfair judgment over which children play “free range” the most, but her point should be that more people, if not all people should be encouraging it.

Great teachers often use what children already know to create scaffolds between knowledge and understanding. But what if there is nothing to scaffold from? Through the play of my childhood, I built the foundations of all the sciences and some math: biology, physics, geometry, geology, chemistry, even meteorology as I watched in the sky the evolution of the clouds, hoping I would get to swim or fish or play ball.  Do today’s generation of children arrive in class with this foundation anymore?  Do they know what shale or tadpoles or a robin’s egg even looks like?

 

One Foot (and a Whole Heart) Still in Childhood

 

My youngest son, Evan, is now a freshmen in a local high school.  He was anxious about going because he’d heard the rumors that every rising ninth grader hears: the upper classmen target you; in fact, they will target YOU specifically especially if you are short.

All summer he has been measuring himself against me, having grown about five inches in the last year.  I now look at his chin.  But this doesn’t mean he is tall yet.

The men in our family are average height. . .not short, not tall.  They tend to range between 5’10” and 6”, if you leave out a set of cousins whose Dad was 6’5”.  The man was not a blood uncle, so my sons can forget that gene pool.

My youngest was born an average length and a solid weight of 8 lbs. 4 oz.  But he has been below the curve of average size most of his life.  Some of this is heredity; some the fault of the ADD meds he has had to take which curb his appetite. But no matter what I do to circumvent these effects, my boy is simply built like his Dad in bone-skinny, and me in height-short.

I am certain he will catch up to his peers soon since he is still hovering on the child side of puberty, while many have gone far beyond.  And having taught high school for years, I know a growth spurt when I see one coming on.  I’ve watched countless boys 5 foot and some odd inches leave ninth grade and come back men in the fall of their tenth grade year, or even the eleventh. . .or twelfth.

No big deal.

To me.

But to him, he knows that there are ADULT males at the school: seventeen and eighteen year olds who weigh 250 pounds and roam the halls looking for kids like him to carry around by the hair.    Good thing Evan is witty.  And he tries very hard to hide these superstitions, too, posturing as older and wiser than that.

But here’s the thing that makes my tears well.  My youngest is still the youngest of not just my family, but of his peers in terms of maturity, and I’m watching him struggle with leaving childhood behind.  He shifts between being stoic and manly, and whiny and emotional, between knowing things he shouldn’t yet, or oddly innocent of common knowledge.

A few weeks ago, he did express this fear of these giant upper classmen and their possible hazing of the freshmen.  I comforted him by saying, “That’s mostly rumor and lies.  Seniors and Juniors are far too busy just living their lives, dating, working, applying to colleges.  The tenth graders are the ones to worry about. . .”

“Whaaat?”

“I’m just kidding.  Sort of.”

We smiled, but we both knew it was simply one of those rites of passage he’d have to face, just like the inevitable teasing he and his buddies have gone through as their voices began to squeak and squawk into something deeper. (His is still wavering up and down.)

Then toward the end of the week, I had to get a document notarized.  As we waited for the UPS store to open, he said, “How am I going to handle being an adult?  I hardly know anything.  Like Notary. What the heck is a Notary? There’s so much I don’t know.” He listed a few things from the previous week that were news to him.

I said, “Relax.  No ninth grader knows what a notary is.  I’m sure I didn’t at your age.” And then  I explained their duties.

But he’s right.  There is so much Evan doesn’t know that I or his brother did know at his age.  My youngest, because of his dysgraphia, is not a reader, and readers are filled with information, even if much of it is useless.

“Well, you know how you fix that. .Read more, watch more news, get out of the house and do more stuff. . .” I said, mentioning how he had been attached to the same pajama bottoms day in and out all summer.  “The more you experience. . .the more you know.”

Luckily, this is our son who loves to travel with us, and he does love new experiences, so his fear of being an adult ignoramus is somewhat baseless.  But I knew I was listening to a child face his future as a man who had to “know stuff.”

Then this past weekend. . .after snapchatting or tweeting or whatever young teens are doing now, with a girl who might or might not be his girlfriend. . .he came downstairs and asked if we could watch Harry Potter together.  After thirty minutes of digging, we located our DVD collection.  We hadn’t touched them in probably four years or more.

Tony and I sat with Evan, inside on a sunny Sunday afternoon, while we watched Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (or Philosopher’s Stone, for the Brits.)  At the moment Harry enters Olivander’s store to get fitted for his wand, my youngest raced upstairs looking for his two wands that we had bought the year Universal opened its version of Diagon Alley.  Again, I had to help poke around to find where the toys were.

And my boy, who just a few days before was yucking it up with me as we viewed a particularly adult version of Key and Peele, spent the rest of The Sorcerer’s Stone watching with a wand in both hand.

Yesterday was Evan’s first day of high school.

And many of you might know, there is a vast mental age gap between middle school and high school.  Students go from being led in a formal and silent line down the hall to the cafeteria, to near autonomy at lunch time.  Their lockers in middle school are usually inside their homerooms and assigned to them.  In high school, they buy them if there are any left over, and rarely see the little closets all year.  He’s moved from a school with 1300 pupils, to one with 3400.  He has more teachers, more subjects, and more strangers in his life than ever before.

He came home exhausted.  We went over his homework, and organized his new notebooks to his teachers’ liking.  I fed him pancakes and bacon, a special breakfast-for-dinner occasion.  He asked to watch Chamber of Secrets, another Harry Potter, this time without the wands.  And my child, beat from getting up at 5 a.m. and navigating pending adulthood, went upstairs to go to bed early.

When I came up to kiss him good night, I found him already sleeping.  But not in his room. . .instead, he was curled up in my bed, on my pillow, soundly out.  How many years has it been since he stopped climbing into our bed at night?

And I can’t tell which made me more weepy: the joy or the pain that both come from watching him cling to his childhood, or from knowing this would be probably one the last few moments I could baby him.

In a few weeks, he won’t even remember how uncomfortable starting high school was.  He will be fine.

 

Where’s the Hair?

Image result for hairy chest caveman

Men’s body hair?   I for one don’t understand where it is disappearing to.  Well, the chin, obviously, since hipsters everywhere are trying to impersonate Rip Van Winkle.

I’m beginning to miss body hair in general.  The other day, my youngest son was glancing over my shoulder while I was poking through a magazine.  On one page was an ad for a hair removal product.  The pretty model held an old photo of herself as a pre-teenager.  Her arm used to be covered in black down.  Not too crazy, just the sort that Italian girls might have sported when I was a kid.

Son said, “EWWW. Yuuuuck.”

“Huh?” I replied, as he pointed to what was grossing him out.  “That hair?  So what?”

And here’s the thing: he says, NOT something about her or other girls, but about himself: “I hope my arms don’t ever get like that.”

Well, my beloved kiddo, they MIGHT!

I was expecting him to say something negative about girls, but apparently very few girls even at his young age have any arm hair any more.  Are their parents shaving it off?  Waxing it?  They are not old enough for laser. . .I think.

I find his reaction so very ironic because when he was an infant, one of his self-soothing gestures was to suck his thumb while he gently yanked and smoothed the hair on my arm. . .or his father’s or his grandparents’.  I mean, my arm hair is  a smattering of blonde, or at the very darkest, light ginger growth, but it is graspable.  Oh, the sweet memories of his nursing, while he played with the little hairs on my wrist.

I’m sure there is some deep Freudian something at the root of his pubescent yuck of a hairy arm on himself.  I’m not sure I want to go there.

But more than likely, it is simply modern culture that is destroying his future self-esteem, should he grow up to be as fuzzy as his grandfathers.  Or Mom.

I know the trend of shearing the body to the skin is nothing new on the female side of the genders.  Years ago when I was divorced and had jumped back into the dating pool, I tried the waxing.  My arms suffering first, which bled,  stopped me from trying the wax in a more hairy, more tender region for sure.  In fact, my arm hair became ingrown, once the somewhat curly bits started filling in, causing a rash the likes of smallpox.

I had to go on a first date on one of the hottest days of the year wearing long sleeves. And of course, the date asked me, why the hell are you dressed like that?

Because YOU IDIOTS have decided hair is gross.

Even farther back in time, before the naked pubic bone trend, while I was teaching in a southern, “traditional” school, meaning a place where the men still saw themselves as the lions of the home, we came to a reading passage in a book which mentioned something about hair on a girl’s legs.

A young man shouted out how disgusting that was.  A young lady next to him said, “Lots of women around the world never shave their legs or their armpits.”

“Not their armpits?!!” he griped.  “That’s just plain dirty!”

“So,” I said,  “Really?  Why don’t you shave your armpits then?  Somehow YOURS are nice and clean? And hers,“ pointing at the girl  ”Are dirty?”

“Well. . .yeah!” said the boy.

I said, “HOW?  Don’t men sweat more?  Don’t they have more hair?  If so, how is it cleaner exactly?”

He started turning red.

I continued, “I think you should stand up now and say to all the ladies in class that you are simply a cleaner human being than they are, but that you could be even cleaner.  And then offer to shave your pits.”  He put his head down on the desk to shut me out and said not another word.

The hypocritical thing is that I did shave my pits then.  And I had no intention of stopping and no intention of men ever doing it.

I’ve accepted that this is just how things are.  So much so that a few weeks ago when everyone was up in arms over Sansa Stark being graphically raped by Bolton in Game of Thrones, and more so when R. R.  George Martin stated this was simply realistic to the time period setting, I couldn’t be bothered to ask, “If you are trying to be realistic to a time period then why is Cersei not covered in leg hair, or worse, why does Cersei have a ‘narrow landing strip’ of hair on her pubis.  Pretty modern. . .”

But the bald woman has become so “normal” I stayed out of that argument on misogyny.  I figured it was the actress herself who wouldn’t be caught dead with hairy legs on T.V..

BUT NOW. . .men are joining the changing trend .  And I don’t like it.

I happen to love a hairy chest, arms and legs on my men.  Whether a tiny smattering in that concave area between the pecs, or a thatch from shoulders to naval and below;  Think 1980s Alec Baldwin or Sean Connery? YUM!

I feel badly for men in general, and my sons specifically, that now they are beginning to suffer the grooming demands of a hair-fearing culture.  Sure, I can see the appeal of a slip-and-slide chest that some women crave.  But the vanity and the procedures behind maintaining such is so unappealing.  If it is natural, okay.  If not, don’t go there, Guys

I also feel badly for the young ladies whose mental picture has been so shaped by their culture that they cannot love a downy chest the way I can.  The Black silk that lines my husband’s stomach.  Tingly nirvana, Women!

And I hate that my children may have ANY itch of self-loathing due to the demands of hair-hating women.  My oldest son whose chest is fuzzy blond does pick and pull at it, and has wondered aloud about shaving it.

I cannot tell him that when I was back in the dating pool years ago after his father and I split, I dated a MUCH younger man. To my shock, the guy groomed his privates and shaved his chest. And even as recently as he had done so, I was completely turned off by the mere stubble on his stomach, and the weird crew cut feel of his pubis.  Of course, I guess men are used to that feel from their wives or girlfriends . . .but I’m not going to discuss that with my son.

Not quite.  I simply said, “Not all women want a naked little boy chest.  Some women prefer MEN.  Keep your hair.”

Come on!  If we can shape people into this current baldy viewpoint, let’s reshape them back to the other.

When a Parent Backs Off

I have two sons, with almost eight years between them. On most days, watching us from a secret Big Brother-like camera, our interactions and love are enviable. Some days you might consider calling DEFACs, or whatever family services acronym works near you. Both of my sons are gifted, based on their IQs. Both sons, to varying degrees have ADHD; my youngest, whose ADD is bad enough to warrant meds. also suffers from dysgraphia, the outie to dyslexia’s innie, and a mild memory issue. These keep him locked in special education, rather than soaring in “gifted” classes.

All things school came easily to me. Sure, I whined over the real life value of torturous calculus, but once I stopped weeping, I did it. For my youngest, this is not the case, and it makes it hard for me to relate. The current structures of the American school system frustrate him even more than you could understand. He faces ridiculous tests that, being a teacher myself, I know often cover irrelevant information, or worse the test writers phrase questions in such a way that the original intent of the objective is lost.

(For example, “Objective: students will apply a variety of sentence patterns in their writing.” Resulting Multiple Choice Test Question: “Read the following sentence, then choose the correct pattern that correlates with these sentences” is different from being able to actually create varied sentences. Thus, kids are drilled on recognizing these pattern types. Worse this question carries as much weight as recognizing poor verb usage, because each objective gets a question on the multiple choice test. I think the average American should be able to use verbs, but not label a sentence’s pattern as SVDOIO, right? Do most people even KNOW what I just wrote?)

Besides pointless testing that determines his future, every year my son meets teachers who, because of pay for performance rules that measure their failure rate, seem less interested in breaking his code and reaching him than in covering their asses. From the moment they meet him they begin collecting evidence of why it isn’t their fault he is failing, and send me messages, which go straight into their files: “Your son is very smart but he did not do his work. Your son sat and stared off into space. Your son took an hour to do what took everyone else ten minutes.”. Then they dust off their hands and say to themselves, they’ve done all they can do.

Because there is controversy over the existence of ADHD, some teachers just shrug it off, and gossip among themselves about my parenting, thinking if I just took his video games away, that boy would learn to work. Duh. Why didn’t I think of that?

Apparently, I put my child into the stigma saturated hellhole called Special Ed, because I want him to have more time on his Play Station, playing Destiny. I’m trying to cover up his “poor work ethic” by damaging his reputation with riding “the short bus.”. I prefer him to be called “dumb” by his mainstreamed peers, rather than cracking the whip.

I go through this the first few months every school year until his teachers realize I mean business, and I expect them to do their jobs, explaining, “The fact that he stares off in to space and cannot easily put his words on a page is WHY he is in special Ed. You cannot simply say he isn’t working and then wash your hands of him. That’s like saying about your deaf students, they can’t hear my lessons. You’ll have to solve that at home.” They squirm and get pissed off and often decide to pit themselves against me, sending me little CYA notes almost everyday.

Apparently, in order to allow a child to fail, teachers just have to say, I assigned XYZ, and he didn’t do it.

But here’s the thing about special education. It is supposed to be SPECIAL. If you recognize that my child is “super smart” and YOU are the expert, then you need to figure out how to get knowledge into his head, and then glean evidence that he knows it in some other way.

When we were kids, teachers could do just that: shape a lesson in a special way for a special kid. Can you imagine Annie Sullivan trying to teach Helen Keller in today’s schools? Would she have said, “Ma’am, your child seemed to stare off into space when I assigned that reading passage. She fails because she didn’t complete her work.”. The girl went off to Princeton because she had a woman who cracked her code.

SO, each year, I get riled up; it takes me months to get teachers on board with the whole it is your JOB thing. I understand their frustration; I struggle during his homework time. ( I mean WHY does a kid who can do the word problem in his head have to explain his process in WORDS? Why can’t he just write the answer in numbers? And why does it take my kid two hours, filled with tears and hair loss.) I get the teachers’ frustration But they are his teachers not I. If I were,I could adjust his lessons; if I were, I’d have a special degree in his disability, right?

I was particularly riled up this past week, facing the, “your kid’s lazy” crap from a fresh batch of teachers. I have a number of “Twelve Steppers” in my life who advise me; from an anti-codependent stand point, trying to change his teachers is too controlling of me. I’m supposed to “let go and let God.” I hear, your son is old enough now, he can suffer his own consequences.

I heard the same advice when my oldest was in the ninth grade and not working up to his potential. But what if he flunks? Well, summer school. Well, what if he doesn’t get into a good college because of that! Well, he’ll figure it out on his own.

I yelled, punished, rewarded, all things a parent does to try and get their kid in line. But I eventually took the advice and let go. He got himself through, improving as time went on. He began improving. No, he did not go the Harvard, though he had the IQ. He goes to a community school by choice to save money, and lives at home still, and we have a calm, loving friendship now. The twelve steppers say it is because I backed off.

But I just don’t think that advice will work with my youngest. To say that he has to live with the consequences of his actions assumes he has a choice here. His disability doesn’t allow him many choices. He cannot choose to spell that word right or even notice it is wrong. He cannot choose to ignore the misbehaving kids in the next row (and special Ed classes lump learning and behavior problems together. There are plenty of actions he struggles to ignore.) So does that make me codependent because I am trying to control his education?

Really?

Sorry. I’d rather continue to mother him properly and be labelled a control freak than let him slip through the giant cracks in our education system. Too many of his teachers would be relieved to just ignore him.

The Son who Loves those ‘Dorky Fantasies’ and the Mom who Loves him.

This started back when he was still small, probably six or seven. He could read, but I was still in the habit of reading to him each night. We had already finished as many Harry Potters as had been published by then, (which I loved; the dry humor always reminded me of Roald Dahl of my own childhood.) But Graham was now ready for The Hobbit, a natural boyish progression in the land of Fantasy fiction.

My own brother had tried to work me through all those plots too, when I was a child. He loved Tolkien, along with futuristic books like Dune, and anything by Ursula Le Guin. We were both children of the library. Being the hero-worshipping younger sister, I tried my hardest to fall in love with The Hobbit, but I didn’t get very far. It did inspire me to try writing my own inner Earth fantasy with talking bugs and moles and elves, complete with colored drawings. I didn’t worry too much about it. After all, even The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe series sort of bored me. I was more of a Jane Eyre, Little Women, April Morning sort of girl.

But then came my son. . .and a copy of The Hobbit.

This is honestly the only time I have fallen asleep while reading. . .and this was reading out loud. I’d get into the rhythm of pronouncing made up lands, made up people and made up vocabulary, and I’d just doze off, the book smacking me in the face. It was like reading to my son in a foreign language; I completely disconnected from my own voice. Oh, I tried. I’d literally prop my own eyelids up with my free finger tips. My poor boy would begin poking me because just before the book would nosedive, I’d start to ramble and mumble.

“Mommy. . .MOMmy! READ!” He was so hurt. Sadly, he finally took over and just read The Hobbit to himself. This might have been both my greatest failure and my finest success as a Mom.

Later came the Lord of the Ring movies. (I got to skip the books, halleleuah.) I adore movies, and I wanted to love the series to the point of obsession, just like everyone else on the planet. (What could possibly be wrong with any movie with Orlando Bloom, anyway?) Though I was a willing viewer of Part 1, Father and son had to force me to Parts 2 and 3. There is only so much Fight, Flee, Inspirational Speeches, Fight, Flee, Inspirational Speeches plot sequencing a woman can stand. Sure. Sure. We loved calling each other Precious for months, too, but I fell asleep during much of the films. They exhausted me.

When Hollywood finally got around to The Hobbit, my second, much younger son had been indoctrinated. So the whole family along with my sister-in-law and brother-in-law had to go. How could I say no. I literally walked out when the first reverent candle-lighting dwarf sing-a-long cropped up. Was I the only one who wanted to both groan and giggle at the sheer silliness of its pretension? Somber Dwarves, Hobbits, AND Gregorian chants? Too much. My family caught up with me rewatching Jack Reacher in another theater.

SOOOO. . .along comes my oldest son wanting to share his beloved Game of Thrones series of books. Luckily, The Hobbit all those years ago had not fully stopped our readers’ dialogue. He loved my Watership Down, I enjoyed his The Giver. But I knew with maps and zombielike creatures, I was heading into Tolkien-like territory with the GoT collection. Winter was coming, for sure.

I made it through the first two books okay. Admittedly, I ate through them in a week. No small feat at 800 plus pages each. Graham loved it and me for it. He could hint at what plot developments would come next, (where-spoiler alert-everyone must die!) He relished how many times I had to reference his giant Westeros map since my eyes are too old for the teensy ones in the books. . .even with “readers”. He could share my hatred of the same evil characters, but become defensive when I was getting offended by how incestuous every family was. The Lannisters, the Targaryans, the Wildling Craster, even a moment with the Greyjoys. . . what was up with author George R.R. Martin and his sister that this is the titillating plot he leans on so often. . .really? Luckily my son was old enough to discuss my distaste. . .

But by Book 3, I was suffering the Tolkien headache, the issue of a repetitious, never-flipping-resolved plot line. Remember that movie The Neverending Story with its addictive song? Whenever Graham came into my room for a plot discussion update, I just began singing, “It’s the never-ending stooooooreeeeee! eee! eee! eee! eee! eee! eee! eee! eee! eee!”

And as much as I loved connecting with Graham, I was starting to hate Martin. I didn’t want to face anymore dreary, muddy, starving, freezing, blood-drenched scenes where people I liked died. Horrendously. I gave up. I stopped. I found myself for the first time wanting to Wikipedia a damned book just to skip to the end, though I didn’t because, well, like I said: everyone dies. I figured I already knew the end.

A year later, I am home on medical leave, which leaves me time for reading. Out of reader’s desperation, I picked up Book 3 of Song of Ice and Fire (the real name of the series) again, only to find it as my favorite of the four I have read so far. After finding the chapter where I left off (pretty early, like chapter six or so) and after picking through Graham’s memory bank, I jumped back in.

I could not recall why I had gotten so burned out, for I enjoyed every word of the rest of that book (except maybe when he drones on with a bunch of minor characters’ names and histories-I skip those). Maybe it takes Martin a few books to finally find his rhythm? Maybe he stopped focusing on the incestuous and the sodomous? Whatever it is, I began to enjoy his characterizations, his ability to make us both love and hate a character (always a sign of a great writer.). Why in the world can I love the Jaime Chapters? How could Tyrion be my favorite voice? Why did I like the Sansa chapters and Graham hated them?

Graham is now of the age that he can discuss the deeper elements of fiction, the literary critical theories that apply. He was better versed than I at this, in fact; he knew what all the experts were saying about pretty much everything to do with the novels: theories on Martin’s psyche and process, analysis of Martin’s views on females, his use of famed mythology crossed with fictionalized history, and on and on. We have had some very intellectual (and pretentious) conversations, my son and I.

I’ve gotten so fond of the series (I am up to his fifth and final book, and I’m holding off just to savor it) that I take umbrage with the back cover blurb, calling Martin “the modern age Tolkien.” Whaaat? I’ve never hit myself in the face with any of George R.R. Martin’s books.

And let me say, Graham and I agree: Martin’s grasp of the greys of the human spirit, when it comes to the age-old good vs. evil themes, is so far superior to the stark whites and blacks of anything by Tolkien.

I know I was slow to the conversation on the GoT hubbub. But that’s okay. The books washed away my failings as a Hobbit reader and allowed me access back into my now grown son’s “dorky fantasy” world. (Those of us feeling left out use the word “dorky” as a defense mechanism, you know.) He can’t wait till I can bring myself to watch the actual TV series. I don’t relish watching the sex scenes with my “child” in the room. I’ll try to be as mature as Graham and not actively squirm. I’ve already checked out IMd and approved the pics of who plays whom. Wonderfully, one day soon, my youngest son, will be old enough to join the conversation as well. ..

Thanks, George Martin! May mothers everywhere embrace this chance to be on the same page as their sons.

Prejudice on Prejudice: Self-delusion

bridge
I live in the South. I should not have been as shocked as I was.

I say that, but I have often tried to defend the South, protect it from its own reputation. Back in grad school, Sarah Lawrence, famed for its liberalism in gender issues, gender equality, rich-kid black sheep, politics, agri-awareness, gluten free before most knew what gluten was, I had a roommate from Minnesota, still a dear friend. She came home with me one summer for a few weeks as college roomies tend to. Her very first crossing of the Mason-Dixon line. I quickly discovered she stepped off the plane feeling guarded, ready to step into activist mode just in case she witnessed inevitable acts of racism.

I laughed at her, really. What decade did she think she had flown into? What I watched instead was a young woman who had never really experienced integration. Here, she sat on buses, ate in restaurants, walked through galleries where workers and customers alike were black and white, socializing, equal. She liked to view herself as open-minded and completely racial-bias free, though reared in a 99.9% white city, attending the most expensive college in North America, where the only students in the one African American Literary studies class were all of the 27 African-American SLC students and one little white gal from the South, me (not her). It was tough for her to whisper to me in the Peachtree Diner that she just didn’t expect so many black people. She wasn’t a racist; just surprised and inexperienced. Easy to judge race relations isn’t it, when you never actually HAVE any yourself, right?

I returned to this theme when my husband took me for my second visit to San Francisco, his home town, famed for always being forward in human rights issues.
Again I found myself defending my South. We had spent the day sight seeing with one of Tony’s closest friends and his wife. Before they collected us at our hotel, we had encountered a completely naked man riding his bicycle around the Embarcadero fountain.

Our youngest son who was nine at the time was so utterly shocked. Wasn’t that against the law–as his more modest older brother swore loudly every time our youngest streaked  the house after his baths?  He wanted to report this naked man to the local Mountie, who simply shrugged. Nine year olds are the fonts of Right vs. Wrong, and tattling. We quickly realized that hundreds of naked men, fleshy and taut alike, were straddling bikes for an annual protest of some sort. Hilarious little story we were sharing later with our friends-slash-tour guides over meal in a yuppy bistro.

Somehow our discussion transcended into parenting issues: whether living in SF where men can dangle their testicles out in public is as kid friendly as the South, where as they believed, racists bloomed on every veranda. Who would ever choose to raise children in the dirty South. . .? I defended this prejudice from folks who had never been to the South except maybe to gas up the family jet on their way to Europe.

I didn’t ingratiate myself when I asked just why they didn’t live or shop in Oakland? Why I didn’t see any African Americans sitting in this, their favorite restaurant? I shared my observations of my former roommate’s visit. I don’t think they understood my point that they were as segregated as could be, but saw themselves as so evolved. Again, easy to judge when you don’t have any real race relations of your own to reflect upon.

I think what they heard me say was that racism is okay when you actually do have to rub shoulders. No, no. Not at all. My point was that the South in many ways has advanced far beyond where much of the rest of the country has, and one cannot know or praise his or her own moral metal unless it has been tested.

Last summer another close friend from California came to stay with us, bringing along his youngest. Mike has three sons, two of whom are of mixed race, African-American and Thai. His youngest son and ours are great fast-friends, lego lovers, video game enthusiasts, mud grubbers in general. They see each other as cousins the way sons of good friends do. Again. . .sigh. . .Again, I was faced with that chip-on-shoulder mentality, the second Mike stepped into baggage claim. He felt defensive in his son’s honor.

I am not sure what he expected. Insults? Spit?

After taking the boys to Walmart for a squirt gun run, he came home feeling exposed. He believed people were staring at this white Dad and his dark-skinned child.

“Both blacks and whites were looking at me funny.”

“Really?” I asked.

“Yes! Man, it was weird.”

“Are you sure?” I laughed at him. “Noooooo. Really?” I was not buying it.

“Well. . .I think so. . .” he waffled.

I launched into the story of my former college roommate, her assumptions. Mike acknowledged that he had never seen so many various races living together in one suburb before, just like my roomie had noted years ago. My hubby snorted at him, too, and said, “I think you’re just too sensitive.”

I teach at a local school, which is integrated, but majority black. If I were forced to guess, I would say that a good 25% of my kids are of mixed race, with one parent being white or Latino and the other African American. No one is giving each other the stink eye at Open House PTA nights. I can probably look up the stats since census loves to pigeon hole us. But my point to our friend Mike was this: “I’d bet that seeing you and your son is more ‘normal’ to the people you run into here than to the circles you encounter out West.”

Yes, I was right. His son attends a school that is primarily white. Mike knows very few other integrated families. But because identifying as liberal is knee-jerk in his home town, Mike assumes that his segregated community isn’t nearly as judgmental as my South must be.  He was projecting his fears onto these Walmart shoppers.

What should we call this prejudice, the South-is-all-Racist-ism? Southernerphobia?

So here I am. . .a history of defending the new South, feeling that we have crossed bridges that other people haven’t even witnessed yet. So when I say I was shocked, but I don’t know why since I am in the deep South, I’m ironic.

This past Sunday, my mother-in-law who retired here from San Carlos, California, loves to throw St. Paddy’s day parties. She had us, my sister and brother-in-law, and several of her neighbors over for Corned Beef and Cabbage. I finally got to meet the famously sweet, Gloria, a retired baker who had been praying and baking for me for months now. I had eaten some of her most delicious strawberry cakes, lemon pound cakes, and tea cookies, for she knew I had been hospitalized and recuperating from major surgery, and gave to me because she loves her neighbor; this is what Godly Southern women do.

With her elegant upswept hair, her feminine sweater-set and pearls, she bear-hugged me and drawled about how many prayers she had been sending to God just for me to get better.

Somehow, even though we have been taught repeatedly to never discuss religion or politics in social settings, the discussion shifted to politics as it does in a social setting. Started on the topic of beer, shifted to “best beer”, to Yuengling, then to President Obama’s favorite beer being Yuengling.

Sweet little old cake baker opens her mouth, “Oh Lord, not Obama. . .”starts to hesitate, but says, “Oh, I’m sure everyone here agrees. . .” Scary, words, those.

My dear sister-in-law laughs and says, “Oh, I don’t know. A bunch of us are from California. . .heh heh.”  As in Hint. Hint.  Don’t go there, Lady.

This doesn’t stop “kindly” old lady from saying with such sharpened vitriol, “I just don’t know why somebody hasn’t SHOT that black boy yet!”

My mouth fell open.   She was so certain we agreed. Probably proud that she had politely said “boy” instead of the forbidden N word. I HUFFED at her, but she kept talking on and on, and all I could do was say as controlled as possible, “Really! Okay, enough of that. We do NOT all agree with you. That is enough of that talk. Stop it now.” And I stormed into the kitchen, well, as fast as my healing broken body can move.

I am not coddled here in the South;  I have experienced and witnessed acts of racism from my peers and students;  (“White people smell like wet dog” to “Oh, I can’t learn here if it’s going to be all black . .. “) BUT I had not heard anything that racist since I was a child stationed with my Dad outside of Boston. I had definitely  never heard anything that unpatriotic, that TREASONOUS in person. Ever.

How could I break bread with this woman in a few minutes and sit down later to a plate full of her cake? I did not want to ruin my sweet Mother-in-law’s dinner simply because a particular breed of bird was singing her breed’s tune. Luckily, my reaction was enough to cow the lady, who was morosely quiet during dinner, and who then skittered away soon after her last bite.

But I felt all my defense of how far we’d come in The South was just a waste of my breath. Was it? Or is she just some old lady squawking what seemed normal to her generation? SHE is why my friends come here with their defenses up; no matter how ivory tower some of my friends might be, there is always some Genteel Christian Racist to help them feel liberal.

Can Competition and Collaboration Co-exist?

Is true collaboration possible in a competitive environment?rolling

I recall a rush of articles about the American Business Model decades ago
asserting that though the foundation of capitalism was competition, as our world went global, Americans needed to examine a new model: cooperation, collaboration.

Group work? Seriously? Sure, we learned in Apollo 13 that a small group of men collaborated with an inner tube, a box and some toothpaste to bring home a space capsule of Americans. . .but how often do we really need to do that?

Group work over individual accomplishments has gone in and out of fashion in the classroom far longer than businesses have attempted it, because it cuts the grading work load by half for teachers, (though we slyly argued that it helped in student engagement, and we quoted all the business magazines about the futuristic wave of collaboration.) However, Americans notoriously have a love-hate relationship with group work; we all know that one person seems to get the brunt of the work, others resent feeling unheard by control freaks, and still others exploit riding on the backs of the workhorses. This has been sticky enough-uncomfortable and unnatural to our competitive roots-so much so that whole businesses have developed just to cash in on ridding us of our ignorance of how to behave productively in group-work situations.

And when that fails, group work in schools is discouraged, considered unfair, even sometimes called lazy. There was a point as recently as ten years ago when my own school made group work against the rules, simply because of potential law suits in “truth in grading.” (Read, Parent A didn’t want Parent B’s kid to affect or benefit from Parent A’s kid’s work/grade.) So out the door group work flew. Slowly as power changed hands in my school, people forgot it was against the rules, and it became again de rigueur, to the point where it is now the trend, not just in the classroom, but in the conference rooms among teachers, across the nation.

The American redesigned business model has finally filtered into the mandates (not just the personal preferences) of our teachers’ work lives. Instead of working in isolation, building our lessons from books, online sites, and our own creativity, we are encouraged to, in some cases forced to, meet with our colleagues and plan, even submit, lessons together on often a weekly basis.

By now, however, I question in a different way those articles of years ago: can competition and collaboration thrive together? Sure athletes can be friends with those against whom they compete, partly due to admiration, partly due to common burden, but they rarely will share their secrets to success if it means the opponent has an edge over them. Think of what the NFL goes through to make sure the opposition doesn’t get hold of their play-books. Omaha! Omaha! Omaha! Indeed.

In the education setting however, we are forced to collaborate, but then often we are held in competition. Teacher of the year? Teacher of the month? Teacher who gets verbal accolades of any kind. Those things alone might not slow us from sharing. . .but a fan base of students might. Or far worse, a conniving powerful administrator.

I have sat in collaboration groups where Teacher So and So is held up as superior. . .”The rest of you should be more like him. . .” He is notorious for not playing well with others; he balks at collaboration; he shoots holes in other people’s ideas vocally, cruelly. Okay, how much of that is arrogance?

And how much of that is trying to keep more of the praise spotlight for himself?competition

The same conniving administrator, whose job depends on students’ scores, likes to pit teachers against each other, making it seem like a friendly competition to see whose state mandated test scores will be higher. (Then administrator rewards winner with smaller class sizes, the room with a window, the course everyone covets teaching. Puppy-treats to teachers.). So then. . . why would teachers share lessons with each other if this comparison results in honor or rewards from winning? (Wouldn’t that be like Microsoft passing along tech ideas to Apple?) Recently, when someone noted how different a colleague and I are in style, I heard from conniving administrator: “Ewwww. I can’t wait to compare your AP scores. . .it will be exciting to see whose are higher.” Does this encourage my colleague to help MY students do their best?

In one weekly “team”, members were once told that another teacher, let’s call her Ms. CheaterButt, had the lowest failure rate (as in zero kids ever fail her classes; we collaborators all know she just passes kids because she doesn’t believe 9th graders should fail, even students with a 27 average days before grades are due suddenly pops out with a 70.) Then we heard we have to sit there and learn “from her” how to design our lessons because she beat us at some unseen competition called “failure rate rally race.” Again, we would have, at one point, happily shown her how to design her lessons so that she doesn’t just have to arbitrarily pass her students, and we certainly don’t want to take any of her lessons. But we won’t now. Instead, we resentfully sit quietly on top of our knowledge. . .while conniving administrator sings CheaterButt’s praises. This particular collaboration group got so competitive that the only time people shared any novel, effective ideas at the weekly meetings was when the conniving administrator occasionally appeared; suddenly we were cutting each other off at the feet to dazzle our boss.

I admit it: I am sometimes guilty of not wanting to share simply because I like being my kids’ favorite teacher. I am a natural competitor. I like having lessons students both enjoy and learn from, and yes, then silently lording it over my pals when kids want me, not them, for a teacher. Who doesn’t. This is probably the same as an actor winning the People’s Choice Award. But the trouble is, this attitude isn’t good for students. Yes, it motivates me to come up with good plans. But it keeps many of us from wanting to share lessons. I force myself to ignore my inner emotional beast because. . .well. . .it is the right thing to do. I have friends with whom I collaborate nicely, and I always have, even before it was fashionable; and I am always open to sharing with anyone, competitors and cheaters alike. But even then, the open ranking of my being “better” can cause people not to want share with me, or even hear my ideas (Oh, she thinks she is such hot shit. . .) Competition when it comes to collaboration does not necessarily lead to mature thinking. . .

In one of those popular American Business Model articles of years past, there was a story of an American Technology Company that had opened a location in Japan, hiring some of the brightest, most innovative people in the country. They were hoping to have fresh ideas, growth, etc.. The employees were set up in groups, departments, teams as they saw themselves. The company started a program, where individual employees could suggest ideas for improvement, cutting costs, enhancing productivity, design ideas. The single employee who suggested that month’s best idea, would win a dinner to a local restaurant. Months went by with not one idea in the box. The company repeatedly upped the stakes, even offering a weekend trip away, to no avail. NO ideas. Where were these Japanese brains, the American owners wondered.

Eventually the American manager heading the idea box pulled one of the Japanese managers aside and asked for his opinion. What he found was that competition among individuals of a team was considered bad form, dare I say dishonorable. To take an idea for improvement, to call it your own, to lay claim to the individual rewards was an insult to your team members, since very few of us work in a vacuum. This concept of pitting fellow employees against each other was distasteful, and went against the sense of community and family that was traditional in Japan. As soon as the company began rewarding teams, departments for successful ideas, the box was full of innovative ideas.

The lesson learned here has filtered to some of the most successful American companies today: Apple, Google, Ford, even Starbuck’s. They have all embraced collaborative thinking, and team reward to obvious results.

collabThis sticks with me as I continue to be forced to collaborate under the rule of a competition loving boss. Are children benefiting from such open individual comparisons between teachers? Is it really good for me to be Teacher-of-the-Year, “Most Inspirational Teacher”, or will it cause my peers to withhold their successful lessons from me, and thus my students. . .? Yes, I hate group work for the same reasons everyone else does: I sometimes end up writing more than my share of documents, or doing more research than others, but collaboration isn’t group work exactly. It’s idea firing. It’s sharing of what works, what can be improved. If honors, awards, titles, and even Pay-for-performance falls to individual comparisons between teachers, who will ever want to pass along effective plans? Only those with children’s best interests at heart. I’d like that to be every teacher, but it is unlikely.

Five Things You Hate about Teachers and What You Can Do About Them. . ..

Editorial Cartoon: Hate | Teaching Tolerance5. We Have Summers Off.

(And Christmas, and Easter, and Thanksgiving. . . ) So many breaks, you’d expect EVERYone would try to become teachers. I can’t count how many times people work this issue into the conversation once they discover I am a career teacher. Currently, close to two-thirds of newly minted teachers quit the profession within three years of gaining a full-time teaching position, never to return. Maybe, as people like to blithely assert, they were women with a “Mrs. Degree” who were just waiting for Mister Right to marry them, so they could work at home raising their own kids and not yours. Maybe they landed a rewarding spot on American Idol. But whatever it is, summer breaks are just not long enough to keep that two-thirds in education for a career.

Just the other day, in fact, a man standing next to me in the UPS line overheard I was a teacher; he baldly squawked, “You know, I hear these complaints about them teacher salaries…(I had not been complaining about a thing.)  Y’all got three months off in the summer, go get a job in the summer if you all want more money instead of sitting on your rear ends.” He said so with a pleasant smile like insulting someone you just met about their professions is completely socially acceptable, like so many other people do to teachers.

I just sighed and did not correct his grammar, nor his incorrect count of how much time I have off in the summers. I didn’t even try to discuss how many hours we work in a year stuffed into ten months. . .nor how many redundant classes I have to take each Summer in my time off. . .nor did I explore the offensive skewed salary scale/experience/hours-worked ratio of teachers compared to other more lucrative careers, like lawyers and doctors–Three degrees, 70 hour weeks, for what-per-hour??  I learned to stop doing that a long time ago.

I simply smile now and say, “Oh, I agree. Why don’t you go into teaching, so you can enjoy summers off?” and walk away.

4. We can’t be fired.

I know. That dirty thing called tenure. First, be honest: every job has due process, every single one. If you have not enjoyed due process when you were let go, then either you were screwed and you need a lawyer, or you were laid off through RIF.

Teachers get cut when there are not enough jobs, and we sometimes meet the nasty end of due process. I have known teachers who have lost their jobs for being drunk, stoned, or just bad. I have known drunk docs and immoral lawyers who are still practicing, protected by members of their profession. All it takes in any case is a boss who is willing to do the paper work, willing to apply due process, yet often they are too busy, or too political, or even too lazy to do so.

Consider an obstacle in education personnel decisions that doesn’t exist in other fields. To fire a teacher brings public scrutiny. (How often do most jobs and their failings get accounted for in the media? No one cares if a teller or a computer programmer gets axed. And unless a lawyer or a doctor goes to jail, no one reports their dropped contracts.  But a teacher? When a teacher loses a job, the community often makes a newsworthy stink.

Education is always in the media; it is a political machine that is fodder for the public. In fact, I recently heard yet another dig at tenure on Tim Allen’s last comedy.

But imagine you have a school principal willing to bring on public scrutiny and fulfill due process anyway to get rid of the “bad teacher”: to prove someone is a weak teacher is difficult since the standard for quality varies and seems subjective.

Sure, you’d think that the public would all agree about which teacher is good, but people really don’t. For instance, the guy who curses in class, yells at your kids till they cry, has a high failure rate, but gets fantastic results on Nationally-Normed Tests. . .do we keep him?  Or how about the teacher who is cheerful, supportive, motivates quality projects from children, coaches everything, has a high pass rate, but a somewhat questionable result on national tests. . .which educator is best? Not everyone values test results as the only indicator of talent in a teacher.  Some people adore the tough assholes and see them as demanding challengers, and some people want their children adored and cushioned.

I have worked with all sorts of teachers.  The woman who is always on-time and rarely misses a day, who keeps excellent records and files, whose bulletin boards are oh-so-spiffy seems like such a great  employee. But wait. . .she assigns too much silent bookwork, and sits at her desk daring the children to speak or complain; they are bored stiff and hardly learning, yet the teacher breaks no rules.   Then there is the well-loved, creative teacher with fun, interactive lessons, but she’s hopeless at discipline, and gee, she seems to miss a lot of Mondays and often skips her lunch duty. . .but, my goodness, look at those stellar literacy scores!  And then there is the favorite coach, who runs a tight ship in his history class, and motivates his kids to achieve and mature into respectable adults; however, his emails home seem illiterate, and his lessons are mimeographed from 1972. . .

Many principals face these very real conflicts: teachers who have strengths and weaknesses.

It is rare to hire perfection, which is what we expect in our teachers.  We want great, dependable employees, intellectual subject experts with creative and up-to-date lesson plans, fantastic human relations gurus, entertaining performers, kind and compassionate, moral leaders, but also strong disciplinarians who never have a rough day or show any weakness. . .Tough to find in one human being.

Plus, each principal knows the old adage: the devil you know is sometimes better than the devil you don’t know, causing them to try to rehab rather than replace their weaker faculty.

Plus, time constraints affect a principal’s staffing choices in ways that do not occur in other careers.  Due process takes any boss precious time to document; however, when a principal finally succeeds at letting the flawed teacher go, and then hunts for someone better, finding a stronger applicant takes months, which can leave your children without a teacher.  No one wants that.  You’d think in this economy, talent would be climbing out of our pores. But, no, not so.  Worse, trying to hire qualified replacements in classically “tough” schools with higher crime, higher failure, is nearly impossible; few apply. Fewer stay.

So stop thinking that teachers can’t be fired. We can, just as easily as you. The difference is that when people lose a job in most industries, the boss just makes their colleagues pick up the slack.   Principals cannot do that; children are not “tasks” that can be dumped on someone else’s docket.  Losing a teacher may mean leaving a classroom with a sub whose only credentials are a high school diploma and a pulse.

(And update:  Covid issues have only made this problem far worse.)

3. We were often “C” level students in college or high school.

The most embarrassing statistics prove this true. While that doesn’t describe me or many of my fellow teachers, it is generally correct. What’s worse, teacher’s education programs are notoriously tedious in work load, but lacking in intellectual demands, so we are talking about “C” students in non-rigorous degrees.

What are you willing to do about it?

You demand excellence from medical students and law students and even engineers, why not education majors? (Well, I personally think there should be no such thing as undergraduate education majors; I am as appalled as you when I discover one of my children’s teachers or a colleague is a numbskull).  The cut off point for staying in a medical, engineering or law program is exceptionally high for students: most must maintain a 3.5 or higher.  Enrollees who fail to meet these GPA requirements or to pass their boards or oral exams are out of luck; afterall, we do not want someone to design a bridge or replace a heart valve who has a 60 percent knowledge of the subject, right?  But education majors can carry a 1.8 GPA; they have no oral exams.  To pass an education certification board exam is super easy.  I can honestly say, failing the English Educators exam in my state means the teacher must be barely literate.

Much of my explanation about tenure applies here. The trouble is. . .whenever any state does raise standards, folks stop going into the teaching profession, or scarier, fewer folks qualify or meet those standards, resulting in a teacher shortage. With that, we are forced to hand out provisional teaching certificates to people with no training at all just to fill the podiums.  This is a nasty cycle that experts and politicians have failed to break.

Does this problem exist because academically sound graduates have plenty of work options. . .? Do you want someone teaching your kids who had no other choices?

Understand, school systems are victimized by supply and demand, stymied by funds, and hindered by even colleges and what they expect from or teach their education majors.  Not enough high-level high school graduates go into education programs; then not enough stellar college graduates go into teaching, which leaves the richer counties in position to competitively hire the best candidates, and the rest to accept the left-overs.  Plus, “best candidates” are hard to judge since so many education degrees come from paper mills.

Notice each state supports only one or two medical schools and offers few law or advanced engineering programs making the system of credentialing these professionals selective…But education degrees? Almost all colleges and universities everywhere graduate them. . .which leaves the resulting talent pool suspect.

How can you mock the low achievements of teachers when you also expect such low standards of them to begin with?

2. We are with your kids more than you are.

Admit it. When you first sent your babies off to school, aside from the secret joy you felt that you had more free time, or that your day care bill was shrinking, you were uncomfortable with someone else being so central in your child’s life.

Studies in child development show that children shift their hero-identity focus from parent to teacher around first grade. So instead of your son or daughter believing your word is God-like, now it’s “Mrs. Belachik says this. Mrs. Belachik says that. ..” ad nauseum. This does not sit right.  In fact this sits so poorly with some parents that I have watched my friends and neighbors tear apart teachers behind the closed doors of Bunko games, book clubs, and scrap booking meets, discussing their children’s teacher’s clothes, hair, and personal lives-from wedding faux pas, to pregnancies, and even husbands, as if we teachers are cast members of Housewives of Education County, not the professionals who love your kids.

Jealousy is an ugly beast to feed.

Add in that we are around your elementary-aged kids for 8 hours a day while you are with them, once they finish their bus rides, perhaps 6 waking hours–some of which they spend with buddies, computers, television and not you. . .You should feel a little threatened.   Even in high school, teachers seem to spend more time with your kids than you do, since as teens mature, they spend even less time with their parents.

An uncomfortable truth: Today’s families rarely eat, ride in cars, or watch television together… But teachers are in your kids’ faces for a good portion of their lives; so important, we teachers.

1. We are the government (who once controlled you.)

You may think Summers should be my biggest reason you hate teachers.  But no.  It’s the fact that we are the government that burns you up. And a government that once had total control over you and wouldn’t let you sleep in class…

Many people try to overcome this truth by acting like they are no longer under the thumb of a teacher, but now the boss who pays teachers’ salaries.  (That’s another insulting comment people like to spit at strangers!)  “I pay that woman to teach, not give my kid detention!” Or “I pay you to get my kid into college, why isn’t he getting an A?”  Or some such variation… Never mind that you pay the salaries of everyone who provides you a good or service–launderers, policemen, doctors–somehow with teachers, you feel more smug bossiness.  I’ve never heard someone say “I pay my doctor’s salary, how come I have heart disease!”  or “My taxes pay for that cop’s job, how come he arrested my kid for drunk driving.”  But woe to the teacher who offends your wishes and desires.

Perhaps, what makes you so irritable is that this “salary” you pay teachers just pops right out of your paycheck as a tax and moves into a system that the media loves to tell you is failing, a system that once controlled you, a system that is overrun with politicians and government debacles.

Think of how we feel.  Geez.

Imagine when you have been shaped to question any form of government, its intentions, its policies, its spending, its system of “checks and balances”, its buddy politics. . .and then you go to work for that very government.  It is your boss.

Most people I know who stand around at cocktail parties complaining about the governor, the president, the Republicans, the Democrats, etc.. are the same ones who complain about education. Ironically, they don’t seem to know that any education system is one of the most political machines out there.

Who sets the education budget? The government of that state. Who defines standards? The government of that state (along with those people who moved out of the classroom usually within six years of their teaching career to become politicians/lobbyists on some governor’s panel.)

Who runs your local system? A board that campaigns for office. Who puts principals into power over your teachers? That very board.  How does one gain notice to earn a position of power from the board? Play into that board’s belief system. Who earns leadership roles under those same principals? The political ones who say, “Yes!” to his/her every whim, no matter how ridiculous it seems.

Can you recall any local or national election that did not have education as one of its central platforms? Never forget that in education all leaders, from principals to every member of the central office and the board, are politicians.  The system is designed to eliminate individual insight and creativity, and endorse sycophantic behavior. I imagine this is true in the business world too, or comic strips like Dilbert wouldn’t be so popular.

Teachers are at the mercy of any politician who is staging a campaign to his constituents. If you voters make it sound like you want higher standards, he says he will attach pay-to-performance. He doesn’t care what massive testing does to your kids in the long run; he doesn’t even care if it’s a valid evaluation system. (Before you get all up in arms over student testing  linked to teacher careers, I am all for it, once it is fair, infallible, irrefutable, and valid-but right now it is only political and meaningless.) If you demand more discipline, then he creates a zero-tolerance law. Or the opposite, if you are tired of zero-tolerance rules, suddenly there are no rules. . .

And here’s a dirty secret: Many politicians use studies to prove whatever their whims are. In the science world, studies are usually strictly validated. Not so in education. The education studies that politicians toss around are performed by students seeking degrees in education programs. . .education programs that are not rigorous. . .education programs that don’t care that the study sample was too small, or even “made up.”  Education programs never truly require validity testing in their published studies. Yes. True. Scary. (Did you not see my answer to Complaint Number 3?)

Remember, education curricula are not science programs; they are not required to apply nor even study empirical, objective testing methods at all.  The results can be skewed or misrepresented.  The study itself can be set up in an invalid format.  Their results are not submitted to any peer reviews nor retested the way medical or psychological experiments are for validity.  But anyone running for any office gloms onto those slim, invalid studies.

And if such studies are performed by a group that is not in an education degree track, then the group is trying to make money for their byproduct book, or they are a political lobbying group. Thus evidential studies the politicians lean on are not standardized; They are filled with flaws, and distortions.

The fact that education is so politicized is damaging to your children, but somehow the taxation part is the only aspect you reject?  Look more deeply.

Okay. . .so. . .What can you do about any of this?

So. . .Here we teachers are, maligned for our free summers, mocked because we are par-educated, resented because we get to see your kids more than you, disrespected because we are “the man.”   Go ahead and toss in that, even though we suffer from the very government you do, we whimsically were once in charge of you when you were a student and you hated school–couldn’t wait to graduate–for we gave you tests someone else told us to give, we demanded that you read things that some board approved, and sometimes we were rude to you because we were too busy with the other 37 kids in class. Probably.

No wonder you hate us.

Yet Resentment doesn’t bring change.  Don’t just vote your people into office; examine the promises they make against reality. (You Floridians once actually believed your governor when he promised to cut the sizes of English classes in half. Californians at one point believed that every kid would get a state provided laptop. HELL, a whole load of people believed The Clintons and then The Bushes that everyone could be above average by this century. Really? Do the math. Go review the definition of average.)

Examine who moves into power and why in your entire education system. And definitely pay attention to how the money is spent.

Most importantly, help come up with a clear cut picture of a good vs. a bad teacher. Discuss this seriously with your friends and coworkers. Principals and parents each have their personal opinions that vary vastly. I have known bad teachers–ones that seem illiterate–whom parents will defend to the end. I have known great teachers whom parents want to lynch simply because they weren’t passing out “A’s” like candy. So collectively, as a country we have to agree with what defines good teaching and then be willing to enforce it. As it is now, many of you don’t even agree about norm testing.

And if you know of teachers who are truly bad, like grading arbitrarily, sleeping at their desk, drinking from their cupboards, writing illiterately in their email. . .document it, take it to the board, force the principal into due process. Don’t just criticize it.

Require improvement in the talent pool. I personally believe teachers should have to have Bachelor’s degree in any tough core subject, then complete a rigorous Masters degree in Education before being credentialed. Getting into these graduate programs should require stellar GRE scores, not the current, lower-than-national average scores. Then, prior to being certified, teachers should pass boards that are as strict as those for other important professionals.

Ask yourself why this profession doesn’t draw/keep its intellectual talent. What can we do to make it more, say, palatable to smarter people? You know the answer to this is very difficult to admit, which is why you probably are not a teacher with your summers free.

Teaching is a tough, sometimes completely unrewarding job; as a taxation-based field, it can never offer financial rewards on par with other intellectually demanding careers. My own test scores and academic records could have led me to med school or law school. But I wanted to be a teacher. I didn’t care about the money. I hate blood and I hate legalese. My career rewards are my students’ success. But this isn’t enough to draw everyone to teaching.

Since the certification methods are unlikely to change, instead, you must politically, and openly press your administrators to hire folks from the toughest colleges, with the highest scores on whatever test is most current for certification. Make it public. Make it embarrassing if you have to.  But make that happen.

Right now, pretty much all level colleges, from the “we take anyone with a pulse” community colleges to the private Ivy League offer teaching degrees. Only three locations in my state now offer law or medical degrees. You want “smarter” teachers, you have to change THAT!  Expect selectivity in education programs.

About your jealousy…It doesn’t matter how normal it is for your kids to transfer hero worship to us; even I, as a parent, want to clock a teacher now and then when I think she thinks she knows more about my kid than I do. I completely understand your discomfort. Once I became a mom, I learned how to communicate with parents of my students, for I suddenly related to what they fear. But build a positive relationship with your child’s teachers.

I can admit as a teacher, for parents who talk to me as a partner, not a servant, not an enemy, not a rival, somehow, I am psychologically unable to neglect their child. As a parent, I try hard to see my children’s teachers as part of my team and make sure they know it.

There is much you can do to improve education. Do something. Don’t just walk up to a teacher you have just met and unload your personal bitterness. We are not the enemy, no matter how much you hated your 11th grade calculus teacher.